Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have an existing slapd.conf you can simply let slapd convert it to a
> cn=config database for you.
That's the -F flag, but how does it works? I made little attemps,
without much success.
As I understand, schema replication won't work with syncrepl o
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 15:52:02 Ace wrote:
> Hi Masters,
>
> We have around 10 entries of the form -
>
> dn: cn=rr1,ou=addressbook,dc=zlemail,dc=com
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: inetOrgPerson
> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> userPassword: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cn: rr1
> sn: rr1
>
> What s
Aaron Richton skrev:
You're just starting out? Try adding your suffix itself first, e.g.
perform an ldapadd on "dc=labbnet,dc=ne,dc=keryx,dc=se".
(Although I thought that would come up as 'no superior' or
something...eh, it's not a case I test all that often.)
Yep!
That helped. Thanks!
BTW
You're going to make me read the manual? I'm like most of the people on
the list, I don't need to read the docs! ;)
http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin23/quickstart.html step #10.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Keryx Info wrote:
Aaron Richton skrev:
You're just starting out? Try adding your suffix itsel
Gavin Henry wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have an existing slapd.conf you can simply let slapd convert it to a
cn=config database for you.
That's the -F flag, but how does it works? I made little attemps,
without much success.
As I understand, sc
On Thursday 20 September 2007 09:45:05 Keryx Info wrote:
> Aaron Richton skrev:
> > You're just starting out? Try adding your suffix itself first, e.g.
> > perform an ldapadd on "dc=labbnet,dc=ne,dc=keryx,dc=se".
> >
> > (Although I thought that would come up as 'no superior' or
> > something...eh,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 15:52:02 Ace wrote:
>> Hi Masters,
>>
>> We have around 10 entries of the form -
>>
>> dn: cn=rr1,ou=addressbook,dc=zlemail,dc=com
>> objectClass: top
>> objectClass: inetOrgPerson
>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> userPassword: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> cn: rr1
>> sn: rr1
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have an existing slapd.conf you can simply let slapd convert it to a
cn=config database for you.
That's the -F flag, but how does it works? I made little attemps,
without much success.
As I understand, schema replication wo
On Thursday 20 September 2007 05:35:14 Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you have an existing slapd.conf you can simply let slapd convert it to
> > a cn=config database for you.
>
> That's the -F flag, but how does it works? I made little attemps,
> without much
On Thursday 20 September 2007 14:51:02 Ace wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 15:52:02 Ace wrote:
> >> Hi Masters,
> >>
> >> We have around 10 entries of the form -
> >>
> >> dn: cn=rr1,ou=addressbook,dc=zlemail,dc=com
> >> objectClass: top
> >> objectClass: inetOrgPerson
> >> mail: [EMAIL
> The problem here is when I have index on cn, it didn't finds what I search
> for. Here is search query -
> ldapsearch -x -b "dc=zlemail,dc=com" "(cn=rr1)"
>Did you consult the documentation? For instance, please see the section on
the
>index directive in the man page for slapd-bdb. It says:
>
>"
Howard Chu wrote:
Gavin Henry wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have an existing slapd.conf you can simply let slapd convert
it to a
cn=config database for you.
That's the -F flag, but how does it works? I made little attemps,
without much success.
Thanks. I appreciate you response.
On 9/19/07, Aaron Richton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you have a complete/coherent slapcat output, and you stop slapd, remove
> your database and perform a slapadd using that output, without modifying
> your configuration (i.e. slapd.conf), you should en
On Thursday 20 September 2007 16:37:58 Gavin Henry wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
> > Note that this feature was already documented in the existing
> > slapd/slapadd/slap* manpages in 2.3. It's a shame that we go to the
> > trouble of writing these docs that nobody actually reads.
>
> We should just wr
Hi all,
I'm trying to see my DIT with ldapsearch, but I can't see anything... the
answer is the following:
prompt> ldapsearch -x -b "dc=example,dc=com"
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope subtree
# filter: (objectclass=*)
# requesting: ALL
#
# search result
search: 2
result: 32 No suc
Daniel,
First try this; /usr/bin/ldapsearch -x -D
"cn=Admin,dc=example,dc=com" -b "dc=example,dc=com" -W
Second try the man pages for ldapsearch(1).
Regards,
David Damon
Senior Systems Integration Analyst
Office: (714) 442-7562
FAX:(714) 442-2845
"Daniel Guerrero" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that this feature was already documented in the existing
> slapd/slapadd/slap* manpages in 2.3. It's a shame that we go to the trouble of
> writing these docs that nobody actually reads.
And it's a sad that project leaders immediatly assume users are
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that this feature was already documented in the existing
slapd/slapadd/slap* manpages in 2.3. It's a shame that we go to the trouble of
writing these docs that nobody actually reads.
And it's a sad that project leaders immedi
Gavin Henry wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that this feature was already documented in the existing
slapd/slapadd/slap* manpages in 2.3. It's a shame that we go to the trouble of
writing these docs that nobody actually reads.
And it's a sad that pro
And it's a sad that project leaders immediatly assume users are just
unwilling to read the docs, rather than wondering if the docs need
improvement.
I just discovered why my slapd -f slapd.conf -F slapd.d attempt failed:
permissions on the slapd.d directory were wrong, so slapd just start and
qui
People...
I have a idea about OpenLDAP documentation. There´s a good documentation at
OpenLDAP website. Why not create more efforts to create a Howto series? I´m
writing constantlty a howto week´s about basic OpenLDAP features, like some
integrations and hints. We can create something like a wiki,
Howard Chu wrote:
Gavin Henry wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that this feature was already documented in the existing
slapd/slapadd/slap* manpages in 2.3. It's a shame that we go to the
trouble of
writing these docs that nobody actually reads.
And
Gabriel Stein wrote:
People...
I have a idea about OpenLDAP documentation. There´s a good documentation
at OpenLDAP website. Why not create more efforts to create a Howto
series? I´m writing constantlty a howto week´s about basic OpenLDAP
features, like some integrations and hints. We can cre
Hello I have a recommendation for the idap recommendation, specifically for
a howto. I think a great howto would be one that expands on this:
http://mattfleming.com/node/190 except going into much more detail outlining
every step necessary for it to work. That is a good setup that will give
ldap us
Gavin Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd love to also see, "It would be really helpful if x, y and x was
> covered".
Ask and you shall receive. It would be really helpful if the slapd.access
man page said something more useful than:
The statement set= is undocumented yet.
--
Russ A
Russ Allbery wrote:
Gavin Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'd love to also see, "It would be really helpful if x, y and x was
covered".
Ask and you shall receive. It would be really helpful if the slapd.access
man page said something more useful than:
The statement set= is undocumen
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, for those of you using sets - why are they useful to you, and in what
> ways are they still too limited? I personally am concerned that they are
> too expensive to evaluate; if we could provide similar features using a
> less general model that would be
--On Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:37 PM -0700 Russ Allbery
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So, for those of you using sets - why are they useful to you, and in what
ways are they still too limited? I personally am concerned that they are
too expensive to ev
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:37 PM -0700 Russ Allbery
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So, for those of you using sets - why are they useful to you, and in what
ways are they still too limited? I personally am concerned that
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Aaron Richton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a concrete case of improvement: "slapd should not be silent on
EACCES (or others)."
Well, it's not silent: it sends an error to the logs.
The oddity here is that there are two functionalities blent into the
same program
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> This allows users who bind to the server to read their person entry when
>> their binding user id matches the user id in the people tree.
> I guess that makes sense. What is an example "user" in this case, does
> that reside u
Thanks Gavin for your answer. I appreciate this.
Yes, sounds like a good plan. The Admin Guide is a excelent start to the
wiki. On next months, if a have a good howto´s to the wiki, where I can
install wiki and leave the howto´s? There´s a possibility to have private
wiki with contributors at ope
Aaron Richton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a concrete case of improvement: "slapd should not be silent on
> EACCES (or others)."
Well, it's not silent: it sends an error to the logs.
The oddity here is that there are two functionalities blent into the
same program: the LDAP server and th
Hello,
i'am new on this List.
We upgraded from openldap 2.2.30 to 2.3.80. (Solaris 10)
Is it right, that in core.schema the entry for uid (and others) is now
removed (commented) ? How can i now found this entry ? Is it hardcoded in
Source ?
The Reason/Problem is, that we have modified th
Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use slaptest instead.
Oh, right, I missed that one. Perhaps this is the missing piece in the
docs? It's not obvious how to explain it, though. I'm not sure the
sentence below is satisfying.
-F slapd-config-directory
Specifies the slapd
--On Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:43 PM -0700 Russ Allbery
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't users just bind using account entries anyway? Isn't this the same
as "by self read" ? Or you're saying that there can be multiple accounts
with the same uid?
There aren't, so I think you're right.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello,
>
> i'am new on this List.
>
> We upgraded from openldap 2.2.30 to 2.3.80. (Solaris 10)
>
> Is it right, that in core.schema the entry for uid (and others) is now
> removed (commented) ? How can i now
> found this entry ? Is it hardcoded in Source ?
Yes, it is
37 matches
Mail list logo
