Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> I'm not judging code quality (I have absolutly no clue), I'm judging
> ease of deployment, and ease of maintainance, both for myself and the
> rest of my colleagues.
OK, let me try to re-state it in yet another manner. It seems that what
you exactly need is collective a
Jason Dearborn wrote:
> Ack.
>
> Just found this:
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200710/msg00343.html
> and this:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openldap-software@openldap.org/msg08524.html
>
> Looks like other people are trying to work with posixGroups as well.
>
>
>
> On 10
Naufal Sheikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ok, so what are my options here. I am very new at ldap, and am doing this
> migration by installing the
> software and copying the config files. Is there any module or library which
> needs to be installed to get
> this resolved, because this thing is
Dr. Hansjörg Maurer wrote:
> I am trying to garnt users access to a group by there group membership.
> Because the groups are posixgroups and not groupofnames
> I have tried the following ACL's according to
> (running openldap-2.3.27-5)
>
> http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1133.html
> and
>
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>> access to dn.sub="cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,dc=byn,dc=drv"
>>by set="([uid=] + ([cn=domain
>> admins,ou=groups,dc=byn,dc=drv])/memberUid + [,ou=users,dc=byn,dc=drv])
>> & user" write
>>by * none
You can check if my analysis was correct and, in that
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
I'm not judging code quality (I have absolutly no clue), I'm judging
ease of deployment, and ease of maintainance, both for myself and the
rest of my colleagues.
OK, let me try to re-state it in yet another manner. It seems that what
you exa
Here, here.
Hear, hear! ;-)
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
OpenLDAP Engineering Team.
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Community developed LDAP software.
http://www.openldap.org/project/
--On Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:59 PM -0400 Francis Swasey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't? Does your accesslog DB keep it's contextCSN updated while
the server runs or does it only update the contextCSN when you start
slapd?
It updates the context CSN every time a modification is mad
--On Saturday, October 27, 2007 11:14 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Everything's happy.
Two other notes.
(a) Stopping, then restarting, all CSN's are on sync in the master:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libexec]$ ldapsearch -LLL -x -D
"uid=zimbra,cn=admins,cn=zimbra" -h free
Quanah pointed out we're running a pretty old version, which could be the
culprit. I know + signs in sets aren't supported. I'm slightly less than
enthusiastic about upgrading since we rely on LDAP+Samba groups. It's been a
few years since I slogged through that implementation, but it may be time
10 matches
Mail list logo
