Hello, Elcin.
> Hi i am suffering from slow slapadd for a 100,000 subscriber. It is
> 27 minutes. this is not what i am expecting.
We wouldn't normally expect slapadd for 100k entries to take that long
either. Your case is a little different though; see below.
> My test environment and the o
Gavin Henry wrote:
Not "surely"; the envisioned use case was a small departmental server
customizing a small amount of data mastered by a main server.
Replication was
never a requirement in the original spec.
Which isn't to say it's not possible, as anything is possible with software,
right?
> Not "surely"; the envisioned use case was a small departmental server
>
> customizing a small amount of data mastered by a main server.
> Replication was
> never a requirement in the original spec.
Which isn't to say it's not possible, as anything is possible with software,
right?
File a RFE
- "Alfonsas Stonis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to log password that was used during bind?
> I tried adding option
> loglevel 18446744073709551615
where did you find that documented? Since the log level is a mask, I doubt
adding digits can help to any extent.
>
- "Gavin Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, anything's possible with software. But first you have to
> clearly
> > specify
> > exactly what it should do, and why. At the moment I'm not sure I
> > understand
> > the present use case, or why it's a good one (I suspect there's a
> > b
I was trying to setup replication using syncrepl with openldap 2.4.11
on two machines running RHEL 5.0
The provider has approximately 1000 entries in the directory.
On the consumer side, I am getting the following error after
synchronization of around 500 records.
Oct 14 16:35:59 osmvm2 slap
Karthik Dathathri a écrit :
I was trying to setup replication using syncrepl with openldap 2.4.11 on
two machines running RHEL 5.0
The provider has approximately 1000 entries in the directory.
On the consumer side, I am getting the following error after
synchronization of around 500 records.
- "Howard Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gavin Henry wrote:
> >> Not "surely"; the envisioned use case was a small departmental
> server
> >>
> >> customizing a small amount of data mastered by a main server.
> >> Replication was
> >> never a requirement in the original spec.
> >
> > Which
I would some advice and how best to go about setting up a redundant
infrastructure for my ldap consumer servers.
I work for a company that has remote offices around the world.
In our main office we have setup 2 OpenLDAP servers running 4.x version of
the software in a MirrorMode configuration. I
