Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Howard Chu a écrit :
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Hello list.
Reading http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/security.html#SASL password
storage scheme, I understand autentication can be delegated to an
external mechanisme. Such as, for instance, a k
Hi,
Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if
> one of the master "consumer" servers is restarted. Up to that time it
> seems the synchronization works perfectly. I had no chance to
> investigate this in details, but
Hi
i have got
'symas-openldap-silver-2.4.11.0.sun4u.pkg'
installed
on
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4v
Memory size: 32640 Megabytes
System Peripherals (Software Nodes):
SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
i have got 1 million subscribers
1.97 GB size of data for *.bdb files.
now my ques
Hi!
Aaron Richton pisze:
>> about sizelimit, but I don't want to raise it (because I don't know how
>> big my database will grow). The question is - why consumer won't get
> Of course you don't want to specify an explicit number, which is why
> there's the keyword "none." Try:
>
> limits dn.exact
Hi,
I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if one of
the master "consumer" servers is restarted. Up to that time it seems the
synchronization works perfectly. I had no chance to investigate this in
details, but it might help to discover a reason for the problem.
O
Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
Howard Chu a écrit :
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Hello list.
Reading http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/security.html#SASL password
storage scheme, I understand autentication can be delegated to an
external mechanisme. Such as, for instance, a kerberos server. In this
c
Hi Buchan,
As you mentioned, I tested the configuration manually in the provider:
I removed all the earlier ACL settings in slapd.conf of provider and
just added the global ACL below:
access to *
by * read
When I ran ldapsearch query using -D
"uid=syncrepl,ou=System,dc=example,dc=
Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
Hi!
Quanah Gibson-Mount pisze:
slapcat the master, then slapadd the brand new consumer.
AFAIR slapcat shouldn't be used on running slapd, right?
No. You *can safely* run slapcat while slapd is running. You *can't*
run slapadd and slapindex while slapd is running
Hi!
Quanah Gibson-Mount pisze:
> slapcat the master, then slapadd the brand new consumer.
AFAIR slapcat shouldn't be used on running slapd, right? Aaron's answer
is the one I was looking for, thank you all!
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski
--On Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:34 PM +0300 ELCIN HAKTANIR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and use its utility called 'searchrate' and 'modrate'
for comparing these two servers' performances.
No idea in the world what those are. I suggest you look at slamd.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Pr
"Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if
>> one of the master "consumer" servers is restarted. Up to that time it
>> seems the synchronization works perfect
Dieter Kluenter wrote:
"Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if
one of the master "consumer" servers is restarted. Up to that time it
seems the synchronization works
Hello,
Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
>> "Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Hi,
I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if
one of the master "consu
Dieter Kluenter wrote:
Hello,
Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dieter Kluenter wrote:
"Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I'm facing a similar issue, but I've noticed that this only happens if
one of the master "consume
Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
"Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
[...]
on remot
Hi,
Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
"Dieter Kluenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mavric Domen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
initial contextCSN o
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Karthik Dathathri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Buchan,
>
> As you mentioned, I tested the configuration manually in the provider:
>
> I removed all the earlier ACL settings in slapd.conf of provider and just
> added the global ACL below:
>
> access to *
>
Brett @Google wrote:
Why dont you try :
limits dn.exact="uid=syncrepl,ou=System,dc=example,dc=com"
size=unlimited time=unlimited
As a test on the provider, maybe your group is not being expanded as you
expect.
Group syntax seen elsewhere in this list have looked is more like :
The group synt
Hi,
I'm using OpenLDAP backend with .NET 2.0
System.DirectoryServices.Protocols API in my application. I'm trying to
issue PagedResult control as part of my request to get results in
multiple pages that code can navigate. This would use rfc2696 which is
already supported in OpenLDAP. But when I
19 matches
Mail list logo
