- Nathan Maier wrote:
> > I don't know in detail about 2.2.28, but OpenLDAP 2.2 should support
> > that control when back-bdb is used. However I think nobody really
> > bothers about checking such an outdated version (the current is
> 2.4.13).
>
> It's not really by choice that I'm dealin
Hi.
There is acl in slapd.conf:
access to dn.one="ou=personal,ou=groups,o=vega"
by
group/groupOfUniqueNames/uniqueMember="cn=users-admins,ou=groups,o=vega" write
by
group/groupOfUniqueNames/uniqueMember="cn=tree-admins,ou=groups,o=vega" write
by users read
And when any
> I don't know in detail about 2.2.28, but OpenLDAP 2.2 should support
> that control when back-bdb is used. However I think nobody really
> bothers about checking such an outdated version (the current is
2.4.13).
It's not really by choice that I'm dealing with 2.2.28 unfortunately.
What is bac
The UKUUG Spring 2009 Conference (24-26 March 2009 in London) has
a strong LDAP flavour.
OpenLDAP and other LDAP technologies are covered by several papers:
* OpenLDAP Replication Strategies
Gavin Henry (Suretec Systems & OpenLDAP project)
* OpenLDAP and MySQL: Bridging the Data Model Di
Irina Shetukhina writes:
> Hi.
>
> There is acl in slapd.conf:
>
> access to dn.one="ou=personal,ou=groups,o=vega"
> by
> group/groupOfUniqueNames/uniqueMember="cn=users-admins,ou=groups,o=vega" write
> by
> group/groupOfUniqueNames/uniqueMember="cn=tree-admins,ou=groups,o=vega"
Best send this to -technical too and the other ldap list.
Gavin.
On 11/02/2009, Andrew Findlay wrote:
> The UKUUG Spring 2009 Conference (24-26 March 2009 in London) has
> a strong LDAP flavour.
>
> OpenLDAP and other LDAP technologies are covered by several papers:
>
> * OpenLDAP Replication S
"Maier, Nathan" writes:
>> I don't know in detail about 2.2.28, but OpenLDAP 2.2 should support
>> that control when back-bdb is used. However I think nobody really
>> bothers about checking such an outdated version (the current is
> 2.4.13).
>
> It's not really by choice that I'm dealing with
