Hi All,
Has anyone passed the tests using OpenSIPS:
http://www.btwholesale.com/pages/static/Products/Converged_Voice/IP_Exchange.html
Thanks.
--
http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/
http://www.suretectelecom.com
--
http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/
http://www.sure
Damn predictive Google Mail!!!
Sorry all, please ignore.
--
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
OpenLDAP Engineering Team.
E ghe...@openldap.org
Community developed LDAP software.
http://www.openldap.org/project/
Thanks for your reply Aaron. Seems to be a log problem. The log level
was very high (16800) and that slows down the ldapsearch process.
Anyway thanks for the answer.
Am 28.07.2009 um 17:44 schrieb Aaron Richton:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Andi Gorhan wrote:
some ldapsearches and everything wo
Andreas Gorhan wrote:
Thanks for your reply Aaron. Seems to be a log problem. The log level
was very high (16800) and that slows down the ldapsearch process. Anyway
thanks for the answer.
This loglevel is nonsense. The mere notion of "high" makes no sense in
OpenLDAP's logging configuration
Is the autogroup overlay considered stable for use with versions of OpenLDAP
earlier than 2.4.18? I know it's being
used on earlier versions (as 2.4.18 is not considered stable yet), but I've
also seen some reports of basic search
functionality getting clobbered after doing so. According to ITS
Ryan Steele wrote:
Is the autogroup overlay considered stable for use with versions of
OpenLDAP
earlier than 2.4.18? I know it's being
used on earlier versions (as 2.4.18 is not considered stable yet),
2.4.18 hasn't even been released yet, so one can't say anything about whether
it is consid
