Challenge With Access Control

2007-07-05 Thread Brian Gaber
that when I am on the replica (10.16.13.85) and issue an ldapsearch to itself I get a 32 no such object with the top access, but I get the expected result with the bottom access. Brian Gaber

RE: Challenge With Access Control

2007-07-05 Thread Brian Gaber
] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:36 AM To: Brian Gaber Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org Subject: Re: Challenge With Access Control On 05/07/07, Brian Gaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hope someone can explain this to me. I am sure it is very trivial. I have a primary LDAP server (10.16.13.84

RE: Challenge With Access Control

2007-07-05 Thread Brian Gaber
, July 05, 2007 11:01 AM To: Brian Gaber Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org Subject: Re: Challenge With Access Control As far as I understand the log - you need to include the port. This should help then: by peername.regex=IP=10\.16\.13\.8[1-6]:[0-9]* read Regards, Michal On 05/07/07, Brian Gaber

RE: Challenge With Access Control

2007-07-05 Thread Brian Gaber
: search access denied by =0 Jul 5 11:05:09 ias2 slapd[11516]: = test_filter 50 Jul 5 11:05:09 ias2 slapd[11516]: bdb_search: 47 does not match filter -Original Message- From: Hallvard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:27 AM To: Brian Gaber Cc: openldap-software

RE: Challenge With Access Control

2007-07-05 Thread Brian Gaber
Michal, Thanks, that worked. Brian -Original Message- From: Michal Dobroczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:25 AM To: Brian Gaber Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org Subject: Re: Challenge With Access Control Add -h 10.16.13.84 or whatever

No such object error after converting from 2.0.27 to 2.3.32

2007-07-04 Thread Brian Gaber
Took the slapcat output from version 2.0.27 (ldbm) to version 2.3.32 (bdm). Used /usr/local/bin/slapadd on 2.3.32 and am using Berkeley 4.5.20. The slapadd works fine. Then I issued chown ldap:ldap on the /var/lib/ldap-2.3.32 directory and files. Any type of ldapsearch results in a 32 no such

No such object error after converting from 2.0.27 to 2.3.32

2007-05-07 Thread Brian Gaber
Took the slapcat output from version 2.0.27 (ldbm) to version 2.3.32 (bdm). Used slapadd on 2.3.32 and am using Berkeley 4.2.52. The slapadd works fine. Then I issued chown ldap:ldap on the /var/lib/ldap-2.3.32 directory and files. Any type of ldapsearch results in a 32 no such object. The

ldapsearch returns nothing after upgrade from v2.0.27-11 to v2.3.20

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Gaber
# requesting: ALL # # search result search: 2 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 1 An identical search when OpenLDAP version 2.0.27 is running returns: version: 2 # # filter: uid=gaberb # requesting: ALL # # brian gaber, gtis, ked1, ncr, pwgsc dn: cn=brian gaber,ou=gtis,ou=ked1,ou=ncr,o=pwgsc

RE: ldapsearch returns nothing after upgrade from v2.0.27-11 to v2.3.20

2006-05-09 Thread Brian Gaber
-Original Message- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:35 PM To: Brian Gaber; OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org Subject: Re: ldapsearch returns nothing after upgrade from v2.0.27-11 to v2.3.20 Thanks for responding. Have you updated your ACL's

More Attributes with slapcat than with ldapsearch

2006-03-29 Thread Brian Gaber
Why does slapcat produce a LDIF entry with attributes that ldapsearch does not show? With my slapcat I get these additional attributes (with values), not shown by ldapsearch: creatorsName: createTimestamp: modifiersName: modifyTimestamp:

Could not locate TLS/SSL package

2005-07-12 Thread Brian Gaber
Here are my paths LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.3/lib LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.3/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/kerberos/lib CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.3/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include/openssl