Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> You may want to examine delta-syncrepl, as well. Normal syncrepl
> completely replaces an entry on modification, whereas delta-syncrepl
> only modifies what changed in the entry.
>
> --Quanah
>
Why not trying delta-syncrepl. But it doesn't explain why , when i add 1
Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following configuration, in OpenLDAP 2.3.32 (i know i have to
> upgrade to 2.3.38):
> Master -> Pivot -> Slave on 3 different servers. SyncRepl replicates in
> RefreshOnly mode, a sub-tree.
>
> When i dump the TLS tra
Aaron Richton wrote:
> You wrote that "it doesn't use the retry setting" but you don't have
> one? I mean, really...
>
> Maybe try adding
>
> retry="120 +"
>
> and see if you get retries to go? They're not expected to work if
> they're not configured. (Of course you'll read slapd.conf(5) ma
Aaron Richton wrote:
>> Another topic about syncrepl : When the Pivot is stopped longer than the
>> interval setting, and restarted, i need to restart the Slave because it
>> doesn't retry connection on the Pivot ? And also, it doesn't use the
>> retry setting.
>> slapd logs the following error:
>>
Hi all,
I have the following configuration, in OpenLDAP 2.3.32 (i know i have to
upgrade to 2.3.38):
Master -> Pivot -> Slave on 3 different servers. SyncRepl replicates in
RefreshOnly mode, a sub-tree.
When i dump the TLS traffic during a replication of a add or delete
operation, i have around 6
Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
>
>> Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>>
>>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> In OpenLDAP 2.3 this will require one more slapd process (while
>>>>>> eliminating the slurpd pro
Howard Chu wrote:
> Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>>>> In OpenLDAP 2.3 this will require one more slapd process (while
>>>>> eliminating the slurpd process).
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 provider
>>>>> 2 regular
Howard Chu wrote:
> Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>>>> In OpenLDAP 2.3 this will require one more slapd process (while
>>>>> eliminating the slurpd process).
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 provider
>>>>> 2 regular
Howard Chu wrote:
> Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>>> --On September 14, 2007 5:21:28 PM +0200 Bruno Lezoray EMSM
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi al
Howard Chu wrote:
> Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>> Howard Chu wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>>> --On September 14, 2007 5:21:28 PM +0200 Bruno Lezoray EMSM
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi al
Howard Chu wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> --On September 14, 2007 5:21:28 PM +0200 Bruno Lezoray EMSM
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i want to implement a specific openldap configuration with 3 instances:
>>
Hi all,
i want to implement a specific openldap configuration with 3 instances:
1st is a master
2nd is a syncrepl replica "and" slurpd master
3rd is a slurpd replica
The reason why i want to implement this configuration is that i have
firewall restrictions:
Only the 2nd instance can establish TCP
our syncrepl failures (which are zero as of late;
>> run 2.3.38!) were much more insidious bugs that updated contextCSN because
>> "they thought they worked."
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Bruno Lezoray EMSM wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>&
Hi all,
few months ago, i developed script to monitor slurpd replication, by
checking replication logs.
Now, we want to implement SyncRepl replication, and it looks more
complex to know a status of the replication.
Is someone already developed a tool to do that ?
My first idea is to compare the
Gavin Henry wrote:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i have a request from a customer about 2 replication architectures and i
>> would like to know if it's possible to implement them:
>> 1 - Master Server -> "hub" Server -> Slave Server
>>
>
> Expand on what you mean by "hub"?
>
>
Hub comes from Sun
Hi all,
i have a request from a customer about 2 replication architectures and i
would like to know if it's possible to implement them:
1 - Master Server -> "hub" Server -> Slave Server
2 - Server1 <-> Server2 <-> Server 3
An other question:
Is the replication with slurpd or SyncREPL supported ov
16 matches
Mail list logo
