I don't know whether 2.3.43 is new enough to NOT be told to go to hell,
but it's the latest of the 2.3.x series and I can't get migrated to 2.4
until I get slurpd gone... and oddly enough, I think turning off slurpd
caused some of my problems.
This morning our two slaves and master server began
On 9/18/09 3:47 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Brandon Hume wrote:
I don't know whether 2.3.43 is new enough to NOT be told to go to hell,
Nobody would ever tell you that. But 2.3.43 is over a year old and 2.4
has been the stable release for quite a long time. Insisting on using it
is the same as
Howard Chu wrote:
Nobody would ever tell you that. But 2.3.43 is over a year old and 2.4
has been the stable release for quite a long time. Insisting on using
it is the same as you telling us to go to hell with our bug fixes.
Moving to 2.4 is very, very much a priority for me. But I was under
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:33 -0400, Francis Swasey wrote:
This is getting ridiculous from my perspective. We've had a rash of people
reporting problems
against older releases and being effectively told to go to hell (which is
what we hear when the
development team or some proxy for them
--On Friday, September 18, 2009 7:33 AM -0400 Francis Swasey
frank.swa...@uvm.edu wrote:
On 9/18/09 3:47 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Brandon Hume wrote:
I don't know whether 2.3.43 is new enough to NOT be told to go to hell,
Nobody would ever tell you that. But 2.3.43 is over a year old and 2.4
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Francis Swasey wrote:
2.4 is not stable by any definition other than the OpenLDAP project has
designated it so.
I would disagree with this. I'm not at all involved in the official
project designations, and I can say that I gave a talk at Rutgers in March
2009 (2.4.15 at
Brandon Hume wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:33 -0400, Francis Swasey wrote:
This is getting ridiculous from my perspective. We've had a rash of people
reporting problems
against older releases and being effectively told to go to hell (which is
what we hear when the
development team or
Ryan Steele wrote:
Brandon Hume wrote:
I realize that users ask stupid questions and run ancient versions, but
I also realize that sometimes those users are experiencing a catastrophe
and have eighty thousand users banging on the door demanding explanation
(ie: me). In that kind of situation
