Is it possible to only log failed binds ?

2007-01-11 Thread Andreas Taschner
We have a setup with a very high number of binds, so running with loglevel 256 floods the log file. According to http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200205/msg00120.html John Dalbec wrote a patch for this for 2.0.21, but AFAICS it was ever submitted. I would like to have eg. loglevel

Re: Is it possible to only log failed binds ?

2007-01-11 Thread Pierangelo Masarati
Andreas Taschner wrote: We have a setup with a very high number of binds, so running with loglevel 256 floods the log file. According to http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200205/msg00120.html John Dalbec wrote a patch for this for 2.0.21, but AFAICS it was ever submitted. I would

Re: Is it possible to only log failed binds ?

2007-01-11 Thread matthew sporleder
On 1/11/07, Pierangelo Masarati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Taschner wrote: > We have a setup with a very high number of binds, so running with loglevel 256 floods the log file. > According to http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200205/msg00120.html John Dalbec wrote a patch

Re: Is it possible to only log failed binds ?

2007-01-12 Thread Ralf Haferkamp
On Thursday 11 January 2007 16:37, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > Andreas Taschner wrote: > > We have a setup with a very high number of binds, so running with > > loglevel 256 floods the log file. According to > > http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200205/msg00120.html John > > Dalbec w

Re: Is it possible to only log failed binds ?

2007-01-12 Thread Pierangelo Masarati
Ralf Haferkamp wrote: Is that really possible in OpenLDAP 2.3 from the man-page I only see that you can configure it in a way that only successful operations are logged "logsuccess TRUE", but "logsuccess FALSE" will log everything (failed and successful) Am I overlooking something? You're r