Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-07 Thread Dennis Misc
Hi, I am new to OpenLDAP, and LDAP in general, and I've been reading the Admin guide as well as the Faq-O-Matic, and I haven't found a clear answer to this, so I hope I am not asking obvious questions. And any help is greatly appreciated. thank you! I ran slapcat on an existing OpenLDAP 2.0.21

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-07 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 03:38 PM 7/7/2006, Dennis Misc wrote: >I am new to OpenLDAP, and LDAP in general, and I've been reading the Admin >guide as well as the Faq-O-Matic, and I haven't found a clear answer to >this, so I hope I am not asking obvious questions. And any help is greatly >appreciated. thank you! > >I ra

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-10 Thread Dennis Misc
>The problem is that when I import that data using slapadd on a new Fedora 5 >machine (that I installed a OpenLDAP 2.3.19 server rpm package on), the >database files that are created have "dbb" extension. I guess it's the >Berkeley DB B-tree backend format. as opposed to the GNU DBM backend form

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-10 Thread Logan Shaw
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: At 03:38 PM 7/7/2006, Dennis Misc wrote: I am not sure if this is a good idea, but I am trying to set the Redhat 7.0server with the older OpenLDAP software as a master that replicates data to the Fedora server. Since they are running different versions

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-10 Thread Kurt D. Zeilenga
At 01:21 PM 7/10/2006, Logan Shaw wrote: >On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >>At 03:38 PM 7/7/2006, Dennis Misc wrote: >>>I am not sure if this is a good idea, but I am trying to set the >>>Redhat 7.0server with the older OpenLDAP software as a master that >>>replicates data to >>>the Fed

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-10 Thread Dennis Misc
I just wanted to be clear.. So it's worse off in having an outdated master, than having an outdated slave. I've also browsed through the faq-o-matic, and there doesn't seem to be a replication guide between different versions of OpenLDAP. (specifically *2.0.21 to 2.3.19*). If I somehow missed it

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-10 Thread Howard Chu
Dennis Misc wrote: I just wanted to be clear.. So it's worse off in having an outdated master, than having an outdated slave. I've also browsed through the faq-o-matic, and there doesn't seem to be a replication guide between different versions of OpenLDAP. (specifically *2.0.21 to 2.3.19*).

Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

2006-07-11 Thread Lise Didillon
At 18:38 07/07/06 -0400, Dennis Misc wrote: Hi, .. I am not sure if this is a good idea, but I am trying to set the Redhat 7.0server with the older OpenLDAP software as a master that replicates data to the Fedora server. Since they are running different versions of OpenLDAP, will this not wor