Hi folks,
I'm in the process of setting up about six nodes, and tossing around the idea
of having either 2 masters in MirrorMode
(traffic to the "active" master is managed externally) with 4 slaves (each of
whom will refer their writes to the active
master). I'm automating some of the setup, an
- "Ryan Steele" wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm in the process of setting up about six nodes, and tossing around
> the idea of having either 2 masters in MirrorMode
> (traffic to the "active" master is managed externally) with 4 slaves
> (each of whom will refer their writes to the active
> mast
- "Ryan Steele" wrote:
> Gavin Henry wrote:
> > - "Ryan Steele" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I'm in the process of setting up about six nodes, and tossing
> around
> >> the idea of having either 2 masters in MirrorMode
> >> (traffic to the "active" master is managed externally)
Gavin Henry wrote:
> - "Ryan Steele" wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm in the process of setting up about six nodes, and tossing around
>> the idea of having either 2 masters in MirrorMode
>> (traffic to the "active" master is managed externally) with 4 slaves
>> (each of whom will refer their
--On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:14 AM -0400 Ryan Steele
wrote:
Does the above logic seem sound or flawed to you? Anything I've glossed
over or perhaps misunderstood? Thanks again for all the advice and
insight - I truly appreciate it!
Mirror mode and multi master are not the same thing.
Gavin Henry wrote:
> - "Ryan Steele" wrote:
>>
>> I want to use MirrorMode, but between six nodes instead of two (the
>> example in the Admin Guide uses three, so I figured
>> using more than just two nodes was fine). As such, I need an active
>> master to ensure that two masters don't write
