Re: problem with replication [syncrepl] hash of passwords

2009-09-21 Thread Evgeniy
Thank you ! >> Remove the commend. That's was a key of my problem. Thank you very much. 21.09.09, 18:34, "Jonathan Clarke" : > > > syncrepl rid=<> > > provider=ldap://server:389 > > type=refreshOnly > > interval=00:00:05:00 > > searchbase="dc=company,dc=com" > > filter="(objectClass=

Re: problem with replication [syncrepl] hash of passwords

2009-09-21 Thread Jonathan Clarke
On 09/20/2009 03:31 PM, Evgeniy wrote: Hello. Openldap 2.4.18, master-slave replication . Slave server successfully replicates all data, except hashed {sha} passwords. It is not problem with "access to attrs=userPassword " - I test ithis. How I can solve it and sync passwords ? [ slapd.conf

Re: problem with replication [syncrepl] hash of passwords

2009-09-21 Thread Jonathan Clarke
On 09/20/2009 03:31 PM, Evgeniy wrote: Hello. Openldap 2.4.18, master-slave replication . Slave server successfully replicates all data, except hashed {sha} passwords. It is not problem with "access to attrs=userPassword " - I test ithis. How I can solve it and sync passwords ? [ slapd.conf

Re: problem with replication [syncrepl] hash of passwords

2009-09-21 Thread Aaron Richton
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Evgeniy wrote: Openldap 2.4.18, master-slave replication . Slave server successfully replicates all data, except hashed {sha} passwords. It is not problem with "access to attrs=userPassword " - I test ithis. [...] attrs="*" syncrepl needs operational attributes, but those

problem with replication [syncrepl] hash of passwords

2009-09-20 Thread Evgeniy
Hello. Openldap 2.4.18, master-slave replication . Slave server successfully replicates all data, except hashed {sha} passwords. It is not problem with "access to attrs=userPassword " - I test ithis. How I can solve it and sync passwords ? [ slapd.conf ] master server: # index object

Re: Problem with replication

2006-06-01 Thread Sandeep A.S
Howard Chu wrote: It's difficult to tell from the sloppy formatting of your email, but most likely you have white space in your slave's slapd.conf where it does not belong, and are missing white space where it does belong. Please read the slapd.conf(5) manpage again and pay attention to the r

Re: Problem with replication

2006-06-01 Thread Sandeep A.S
Did you add cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc=com to your replica before trying to do this? Also, you might want to specify 'dn.exact="cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc=com" write' instead of just "cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc=com" write in your replica's ACL. The slave ACLs are in the wrong order, so there is no way

Re: Problem with replication

2006-06-01 Thread Howard Chu
It's difficult to tell from the sloppy formatting of your email, but most likely you have white space in your slave's slapd.conf where it does not belong, and are missing white space where it does belong. Please read the slapd.conf(5) manpage again and pay attention to the rules for white space

Re: Problem with replication

2006-05-31 Thread Howard Chu
matthew sporleder wrote: On 5/31/06, Sandeep A.S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: access to attrs=userPassword by self write by * auth access to * by self write by * read replica uri=ldap://192.168.128.248: suffix="dc=nc,dc=com" bind

Re: Problem with replication

2006-05-31 Thread matthew sporleder
On 5/31/06, Sandeep A.S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: access to attrs=userPassword by self write by * auth access to * by self write by * read replica uri=ldap://192.168.128.248: suffix="dc=nc,dc=com" binddn="cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc

Re: Problem with replication

2006-05-31 Thread Aaron Richton
> binddn="cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc=com" > bindmethod=simple credentials=secret [...] > Error: ldap_simple_bind_s for 192.168.128.248: failed: Invalid > credentials Perhaps you need to add an entry "cn=Replicator,dc=nc,dc=com" with a userPassword of "secret" (or a

Problem with replication

2006-05-31 Thread Sandeep A.S
Hi I am facing problem with replication: I am using the version openldap-2-3-24 My relevent Master config is : access to attrs=userPassword by self write by * auth access to * by self write by * read replica uri=ldap://192.168.128.248:

Re: Problem with replication in many databases

2006-04-26 Thread Aaron Richton
> replica uri=ldap://192.168.0.2:389 [...] > replica uri=ldap://192.168.0.2:389 It's been quite a while since I've used slurpd, but I recall the uri (or possibly just the hostname, like I said, it's been a while) was a primary key for it. So in your config only one replica would run. I ended up wo

Re: Problem with replication in many databases

2006-04-26 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:41 PM -0300 Daniel Kobayashi Imori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Can someone help me? I have to configure many databases running in one openldap with replication... But when I do that, only the replication of first database worked... 1) I suggest you re

Problem with replication in many databases

2006-04-26 Thread Daniel Kobayashi Imori
Hi, Can someone help me? I have to configure many databases running in one openldap with replication... But when I do that, only the replication of first database worked... The master slapd.conf part: --- database bdb suffix "dc=db1" rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=db1" rootpw {SSHA}k6aHDkx/Q3aVNeL5WXVaf

Problem with replication

2005-10-13 Thread Jeffrey D. Means
I am having a problem with replication: On my master server the update occurs but when slurpd passes the changes / modification the slave responds in the log that no user modification is allowed. -- Snip Oct 12 12:22:14 anuket slapd[8094]: conn=5 fd=8 ACCEPT from IP=[IP Removed]:32803 (IP=0.0.0.0

Re: Problem with replication

2005-09-14 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:31 PM -0700 Johan A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, I wasn't aware that slapadd did indexing. The error in .rej seems always to be ERROR: Insufficient access which I can't see makes much sense. The Replicator can add new entries to the slave and hence se

Re: Problem with replication

2005-09-13 Thread Johan A
Thanks, I wasn't aware that slapadd did indexing. The error in .rej seems always to be ERROR: Insufficient access which I can't see makes much sense. The Replicator can add new entries to the slave and hence seem to be able to write to it. And this setup is using the same access controls as the fi

Re: Problem with replication

2005-09-13 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, September 12, 2005 11:55 PM -0700 Johan A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I had 2 machines with a working OpenLDAP master/slave setup. But due to harddisk crash I wanted to move this to 2 new machines. To do this I copied the both slapd.conf and edited the "replica" section with

Problem with replication

2005-09-13 Thread Johan A
Hi, I had 2 machines with a working OpenLDAP master/slave setup. But due to harddisk crash I wanted to move this to 2 new machines. To do this I copied the both slapd.conf and edited the "replica" section with the new hostnames. I also shut down the old LDAP master and dumped it to an LDIF file w