Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-18 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:00 AM -0500 "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:56:43 -0500 "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:27:32 -0500 "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interestingly enough, though

Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-18 Thread James F. Hranicky
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:56:43 -0500 "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:27:32 -0500 > "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Interestingly enough, though, when searching for just on attribute, the > > linux queries come out on top, about 10K r/s vs

Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-18 Thread James F. Hranicky
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:27:32 -0500 "James F. Hranicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interestingly enough, though, when searching for just on attribute, the > linux queries come out on top, about 10K r/s vs 8K r/s on sol10. I spoke a little too soon. Linux only comes out faster when searching for

Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-18 Thread James F. Hranicky
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:10:48 -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a comparison, with 12 clients querying, I maxed out my 100MB ethernet > with the size of entries I'm using at 8,664 searches/second, and by > dropping the entire entry and using just a single attribute returne

Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-17 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:37 PM -0800 Ron Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What does this value do, and is it best to leave it set on x86 Linux v2.6.xx kernel? Other than upgrade to 2.3.18, which fixes the mess... It tried to fix the issue with sched_yield() that the linux 2.6 deve

REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-17 Thread Ron Grant
What does this value do, and is it best to leave it set on x86 Linux v2.6.xx kernel? This value appears to be set by "configure". I'm trying to build an RPM so would have to modify that value after "configure", but I'd like to know what it's going to affect first. Stability is more important t

Re: REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]

2006-01-17 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:37 PM -0800 Ron Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What does this value do, and is it best to leave it set on x86 Linux v2.6.xx kernel? This value appears to be set by "configure". I'm trying to build an RPM so would have to modify that value after "configure"