At 02:14 PM 7/15/2005, Aaron Richton wrote:
>> Would it a big deal to make a feature request for something like
>> SHA-256, SHA-512, and/or Blowfish support?
>
>Well, in terms of going to the ITS page and getting something requested on
>the record, probably not. But in terms of it actually getting
> So it would seem the short answer to my question is I either choose one
> of the ones listed in the manpage, or do something like add the
> additional hash support to crypt() itself, which doesn't appeal to me
> since I'd be changing one of the distributed-with-the-OS-core
> functions.
Depends o
Thanks for the response.
--- Aaron Richton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This e-mail appears to be premised on out of date information. It
> sounds
> like you're implementing a new server; I strongly suggest using the
> latest
> version of OpenLDAP 2.3 available from openldap.org.
Yes, this would
This e-mail appears to be premised on out of date information. It sounds
like you're implementing a new server; I strongly suggest using the latest
version of OpenLDAP 2.3 available from openldap.org. If nothing else, the
documentation improvements will save you time; in these answers, I refer
to d
Like many, I'm planning to use OpenLDAP for user authentication and
NSS. However, after reading the documentation for OpenLDAP, I'm still
confused/uncertain on a couple of things.
1. I want to make sure all ldap sessions occur via TLS, enforced by
slapd, and since ldaps:// is considered deprecate
