Re: requesting clarification of slapd.conf-versus-slapd.d configuration

2006-04-27 Thread Eric Irrgang
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Howard Chu wrote: Regardless of any existing config directory, when both flags are specified, the slapd.conf file is read and written out in config directory format. If there were any other conditions on the behavior, it would say so. Since there is not, it does not. With

Re: requesting clarification of slapd.conf-versus-slapd.d configuration

2006-04-27 Thread Howard Chu
Eric Irrgang wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Howard Chu wrote: Regardless of any existing config directory, when both flags are specified, the slapd.conf file is read and written out in config directory format. If there were any other conditions on the behavior, it would say so. Since there is

Re: requesting clarification of slapd.conf-versus-slapd.d configuration

2006-04-27 Thread Eric Irrgang
Okay... Maybe I should be asking instead what you consider best practice for maintaining a configuration with OL2.3. At this point it sounds like every change to slapd.conf warrants removal of both slapd.d and DB_CONFIG. That's fine, if maintaining configuration in slapd.conf is the way to go,

Re: requesting clarification of slapd.conf-versus-slapd.d configuration

2006-04-26 Thread Michael Ströder
Howard Chu wrote: Eric Irrgang wrote: I'm also a little confused by the intended behavior of include files. slapd.conf include directives are only preserved in the config directory for purposes of documentation, they are never reprocessed. This is indeed confusing. I'd rather drop this.

Re: requesting clarification of slapd.conf-versus-slapd.d configuration

2006-04-26 Thread Howard Chu
Michael Ströder wrote: Howard Chu wrote: Eric Irrgang wrote: I'm also a little confused by the intended behavior of include files. slapd.conf include directives are only preserved in the config directory for purposes of documentation, they are never reprocessed. This is indeed confusing.