On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 23:31 +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
This wouldn't even break pagedResponse in back-bdb/back-
hdb, as far as I understand.
I mean: not more than it's already now :)
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
Responsabile Open Solution
SysNet s.n.c.
Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia -
I'm sorry if this has already been discussed, but I can't seem to find
such a thread in the archives...
With OL 2.2.29 it looks to me like the sizelimit specified by a client
search is evaluated after the ACLs on the server side, so that if a client
specifies a sizelimit of 10 and receives 8
Eric Irrgang wrote:
I'm sorry if this has already been discussed, but I can't seem to find
such a thread in the archives...
With OL 2.2.29 it looks to me like the sizelimit specified by a client
search is evaluated after the ACLs on the server side, so that if a client
specifies a sizelimit of
I think the general assumption was that if the client
has some search permission (check by test_filter
prior to calling send_search_entry), it has read on
entry. Now, with overlays and other things happening,
having send_search_result indicate whether or not an entry
was actually sent (or
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
I think the general assumption was that if the client
has some search permission (check by test_filter
prior to calling send_search_entry), it has read on
entry. Now, with overlays and other things happening,
having send_search_result indicate whether or not an entry
was
