I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database.
When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it
complains about schema conflicts. The 2.1 version, however, does not
complain. (This is also true of slapd, which is a little more
expected)
Should I work on resolv
as I see there are some changes in schemas between the two versions. Now in
2.3:
only 1 structural objetClass in an ldap entrie
also in an ldif file you must define the define the attribute used for the
DN ie.:
dn: cn=toto, ou=people, dc=myorg
cn: toto
in the ACLs in slapd.conf if you have som
matthew sporleder writes:
> I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database.
> When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it
> complains about schema conflicts.
Yuck. Don't do that. To access your database files, use programs from
the LDAP version (and prefera
--On Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:21 AM -0400 matthew sporleder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database.
When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it
complains about schema conflicts. The 2.1 version, however, does not
co
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:21:33AM -0400, matthew sporleder wrote:
> I am attempting to use slapcat to create an ldif of my 2.1 database.
> When I use the modern (2.3.21) slapcat on my 2.1 database, it
> complains about schema conflicts. The 2.1 version, however, does not
> complain. (This is al
