Re: mmr pair stops replicating: "consumer state is newer than provider"

--On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:35 PM -0400 btb wrote: On 6/27/17 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:37 AM -0400 btb wrote: i'm using 2.4.44 on freebsd, built from ports. i can provide any config details etc - i just didn't

Re: mmr pair stops replicating: "consumer state is newer than provider"

On 6/27/17 10:27 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:37 AM -0400 btb wrote: i'm using 2.4.44 on freebsd, built from ports. i can provide any config details etc - i just didn't want to inundate the post with guesses on detail that might not be

Re: Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 09:02 -0700, Ludovic Poitou wrote: > Hi, > > > As far as I remember, since this happened more than 10 years ago, Luke > working with people at HP started to revise RFC2307 (which is > experimental i.e. not even close to a standard). Sun and HP > implemented some of the

[Q] can I replicate several branches to the same slave from one master?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, please advise I need to replicate not all but some branches from one master to one slave not sure how much correct I have done that, but here what I have: slave starts successfully, records appear on slave as expected, services successfully

Re: Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

John Lewis wrote: > It is only going to take me a couple days to read the whole archive > (Thanks Evolution team https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/ for mbox > import support) and another half hour to change into the cloths of the > corporate entity I want to go into the discussion as. If you

Re: Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

Hi, As far as I remember, since this happened more than 10 years ago, Luke working with people at HP started to revise RFC2307 (which is experimental i.e. not even close to a standard). Sun and HP implemented some of the ideas, but other vendors did not. Just my 2 cents. Ludo — Ludovic Poitou

Re: Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Ströder wrote: > John Lewis wrote: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02 > > > > They only thing that jumps at me is the name. It doesn't follow rfc > > norms. > > Naming is fine because it's still only a Internet draft and not an

Re: mmr pair stops replicating: "consumer state is newer than provider"

--On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:37 AM -0400 btb wrote: i'm using 2.4.44 on freebsd, built from ports. i can provide any config details etc - i just didn't want to inundate the post with guesses on detail that might not be relevant. What is your accesslog purge setting? Do

mmr pair stops replicating: "consumer state is newer than provider"

hi. i have two servers, in an mmr arrangement, using delta-syncrepl. on a couple of occasions, the servers have stopped replicating, and the following is logged: dsa1: Jun 27 06:13:29 ldap0 slapd[8699]: do_syncrep2: rid=000 LDAP_RES_SEARCH_RESULT Jun 27 06:13:29 ldap0 slapd[8699]:

Re: Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

John Lewis wrote: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02 > > They only thing that jumps at me is the name. It doesn't follow rfc > norms. Naming is fine because it's still only a Internet draft and not an RFC. > I am having a really hard time finding anyone who says that the

RE: LDAP Issue: Logging region out of memory; you may need to increase its size

Hi, Thanks for the following information. Can you please provide your input for the following queries below: •Is database cache is all that I have to take care off only? •How to decide the value of ‘set_lg_regionmax’ parameter? •For below problem should I need to increase the value of DB cache

Why didn't rfc2307bis supersede rfc2307?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02 They only thing that jumps at me is the name. It doesn't follow rfc norms. Normally a new standard would be rfc and then the next number available. This one deviated, It used the same number as the old one and appended text. The standard