Re: Is existing documentation kind of vague?

> On Nov 17, 2017, at 12:34 AM, William Brown wrote: > > Whoa mate - I'm not here to claim that 389 is a better ldap server - we > just do some different things. We acknowledge our limitations and are > really working on them and paying down our tech debt. We want to remove

Re: Is existing documentation kind of vague?

MJ J wrote: > I know because I have built such a system (based on OpenLDAP) and > deployed it internationally. So what makes your system special, which goals does it reach and how? Ciao, Michael.

Re: One account for modifying directory and wiki

On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:51 +1000, William Brown wrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 11:26 -0500, John Lewis wrote: > > I want to have one account for modifying both a LDAP directory and > > a > > Mediawiki. What tactic would you you use to do it? > > I'm not sure this is a tough issue: the access

Re: ssf Security Question

William Brown wrote: > Just want to point out there are some security risks with ssf settings. > I have documented these here: > > https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/html/2016/11/23/the_minssf_trap.html Nice writeup. I always considered SSF values to be naive and somewhat overrated. People expect

Re: Is existing documentation kind of vague?

MJ J wrote: > You're right, except for the fact that deploying 2 lines of new code > into production can still be a long process ;-) The phrase comes to > mind: If it ain't broken, don't fix it. You're free to decide to ignore good advice. But you have to accept that someone might point out