Re: Too Much LDAP Log Activity?

I agree that logrotate can handle this but I guess what's the point of logging normal activity that's not actionable? On Nov 22, 2017 2:30 PM, "MJ J" wrote: > 1mb every few minutes is inconsequential - no impact on performance or > disk space. You have logrotate to handle the disk space. > > 1gb

Re: Too Much LDAP Log Activity?

1mb every few minutes is inconsequential - no impact on performance or disk space. You have logrotate to handle the disk space. 1gb every few minutes and you have a real problem to worry about in terms of both performance and disk space. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Douglas Duckworth wrote:

Re: Too Much LDAP Log Activity?

local4.* but I really would only want to see warnings. Would auth failures show up in local4.warn? On Nov 22, 2017 1:48 PM, "Frank Swasey" wrote: I send all - but, what gets sent is controlled by the loglevel statement in your config - what have you set yours to? On 11/22/17, 13:36, "openlda

Re: Too Much LDAP Log Activity?

I send all - but, what gets sent is controlled by the loglevel statement in your config - what have you set yours to? On 11/22/17, 13:36, "openldap-technical on behalf of Douglas Duckworth" mailto:openldap-technical-boun...@openldap.org> on behalf of dod2...@med.cornell.edu

Too Much LDAP Log Activity?

Hi Thanks to several users on this list I have our cluster up and running. The databases look good as does performance. However, logs are increasing about 1MB every few minutes. Does everyone typically send all of local4 to a file or only filter out for example warning and above? Thanks, Dougl

Re: Antw: Re: ssf Security Question

On 21.11.2017 22:39, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Monday, November 20, 2017 8:43 AM +0100 Ulrich Windl > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> BTW: Does anyone know the backgraound of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server >> (SLES) moving from OpenLDAP to Redhat's directory server in ist next >> release? > > Do you