Hi,
As far as I remember, since this happened more than 10 years ago, Luke
working with people at HP started to revise RFC2307 (which is experimental
i.e. not even close to a standard). Sun and HP implemented some of the
ideas, but other vendors did not.
Just my 2 cents.
Ludo
—
Ludovic Poitou
In my opinion, the pwdPolicySubentry attribute should be read-only
generated by the server.
We had made the error in Sun Directory Server to allow customers to set it
manually, and it was very confusing that the attribute served 2 roles : a
way to find the pwd policy entry applicable for the entry
nd now OpenDJ to have a
properly defined attribute with a different name: isMemberOf, operational and
read-only.
My 2 cents,
Ludo
--
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.com
From: Michael Ströder
Reply: Michael Ströder >
Date: 27 Apr 2015 at 22:43:41
To: Andrew Findlay >
Cc: openld
So do i ;-)
--
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
On 26 Nov 2014 at 07:57:27, Gremaud Cyrill (cyrill.grem...@hefr.ch) wrote:
Yes i know, that was a joke...
De : Ludovic Poitou [ludovic.poi...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 26 novembre 2014 07:53
There are alternative open source enterprise solutions to OpenLDAP… no need to
start developing your own !
Regards,
Ludo
--
Ludovic Poitou
Product Manager for OpenDJ, open source LDAP directory services...
On 26 Nov 2014 at 07:29:18, Gremaud Cyrill (cyrill.grem...@hefr.ch) wrote:
If you not
r.
>
> I found LemonLDAP:NG and OpenAM as possible candidates.
>
> Howtos and success stories are welcome!
>
>
> Marc
>
>
--
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
A few comments inline...
--
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
From: Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com
Reply: Alejandro Imass aim...@yabarana.com
Date: March 13, 2014 at 20:25:49
To: Joshua Riffle jrif...@apu.edu
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org openldap-technical@openldap.org
Hi John,
Your comments are surprising. Can you elaborate on how OpenDJ is not
friendly and slow ?
Kind regards,
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock
Product Manager for OpenDJ.
On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, Borresen, John - 0442 - MITLL <
john.borre...@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
> All,
>
> There is a
OpenDJ LDAP SDK and toolkit is Java based : opendj.forgerock.org.
Otherwise, Apache Directory also has a Java based library.
Regards,
Ludovic.
--
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
From: Ali Gholami ghol...@kth.se
Reply: Ali Gholami ghol...@kth.se
Date: February 12, 2014
Howard,
I don't dispute the 2 implementations. 2 doesn't make a standard though, even
if it's more than any other LDAP replication spec.
My main point is that RFC4533 is not a standard but describes an
experimentation.
Regards,
Ludo
--
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.wor
lt. Currently OpenLDAP and Apache
> Directory support it, I'm not aware of anyone else.
>
>
I wouldn't say that IETF succeeded. RFC4533 is an experimental document and in
no way represents a consensus on how to do LDAP synchronization or replication.
Regards,
Ludovic.
--
Lud
more about those who migrate to OpenDJ (initially started by
Sun as OpenDS to replace Sun DSEE).
Cordialement,
Ludovic
--
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock - Product Manager for OpenDJ.
http://forgerock.com
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 at 14:45 , Stanislas LEVEAU wrote:
and posixShadow are auxiliary objectClasses but i don't
> understand which is their structural objectclass. i've seen some examples
> with account object class. is it this one?
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock - Product Manager for OpenDJ, open source LDAP directory services in
Hi,
For Java apps, one might also want to consider Apache Directory API
<http://directory.apache.org/api/> or OpenDJ LDAP API and Toolkit
<http://opendj.forgerock.org/opendj-ldap-sdk/>.
Kind regards,
Ludovic.
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock - Product Manager for OpenDJ, open source LD
<http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/updated-schema-convert-py-script-for-opends/>
Ludo
---
Ludovic Poitou
ForgeRock - Product Manager for OpenDJ, open source LDAP directory services
http://forgerock.com
http://ludopoitou.wordpress.com
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Jonathan Clarke wrote:
> On
15 matches
Mail list logo