Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Index seems to return wrong amount of candidate causing really poor search performance

2021-08-19 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, August 19, 2021 9:18 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl wrote: Still I'm slighly confused: If the default is 16 and you set it to (let's say) 18, by which power of two will the value be increased? 2^18 - 2^16 is not a power of 2, so you could increase the value three times by 2^16 (one

Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Index seems to return wrong amount of candidate causing really poor search performance

2021-08-19 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount schrieb am 18.08.2021 um 17:34 in Nachricht <1ACF53407B440BCD96A18A3F@[192.168.1.4]>: > > ‑‑On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 9:15 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl > wrote: > >>> idlexp value increases the index slot range by a power of 2. The >>> largest >> >> Did you mean "to a

Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Index seems to return wrong amount of candidate causing really poor search performance

2021-08-18 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 9:15 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl wrote: idlexp value increases the index slot range by a power of 2. The largest Did you mean "to a power of 2", or do you really mean "by a power of 2"? It increases by a power of 2, as documented in the man page. idlexp

Antw: [EXT] Re: Index seems to return wrong amount of candidate causing really poor search performance

2021-08-18 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount schrieb am 16.08.2021 um 23:20 in Nachricht <45379D5CBFA94DE3B1EA38E5@[192.168.1.4]>: > > ‑‑On Monday, August 16, 2021 10:00 PM + Petteri Stenius > wrote: > >> >> Thank you for your quick response. >> >> >> If idlexp is the accepted solution then I'd like to