RE: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-15 Thread masarati
> Hello, > >> You can do this just fine. I do it in all my installs. >> You simply need to declare them in the right order. I.e., you must >> declare monitor, etc before the empty suffix. > > I did not realize that the order was important. > > Thank you very much ! > > > For meta backend it can b

RE: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-15 Thread Guy.Baconniere
Hello, > You can do this just fine. I do it in all my installs. > You simply need to declare them in the right order. I.e., you must declare > monitor, etc before the empty suffix. I did not realize that the order was important. Thank you very much ! For meta backend it can be a good add-

Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-14 Thread Howard Chu
9661 email: chris.jac...@apollogrp.edu - Original Message - From: openldap-technical-bounces+chris.jacobs=apollogrp@openldap.org To: guy.baconni...@swisscom.com; openldap-technical@openldap.org Sent: Sun Jun 13 20:20:07 2010 Subject: Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty s

Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-14 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Monday, June 14, 2010 7:51 AM -0700 Chris Jacobs wrote: Where is it documented how the conf file slapd.conf file is processed? I've read the documentation, more than once, and still don't know. I suspect this whole 'order thing' is pretty darn important (outside of access config). Seri

Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-14 Thread Chris Jacobs
ris.jacobs=apollogrp@openldap.org To: guy.baconni...@swisscom.com ; openldap-technical@openldap.org Sent: Sun Jun 13 20:20:07 2010 Subject: Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix --On Sunday, June 13, 2010 12:17 PM +0200 guy.baconni...@swisscom.com wrote: > Hello, > &

Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-13 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Sunday, June 13, 2010 12:17 PM +0200 guy.baconni...@swisscom.com wrote: Hello, We want to update our old OpenLDAP server from 2.1.x to 2.4.x but the current configuration do not use a regular suffix (o=foo,c=bar nor dc=foo,dc=bar) but use an empty suffix (""). We want to move away from em

Re: Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-13 Thread masarati
> Hello, > > We want to update our old OpenLDAP server from 2.1.x to 2.4.x but the > current > configuration do not use a regular suffix (o=foo,c=bar nor dc=foo,dc=bar) > but > use an empty suffix (""). > > We want to move away from empty suffix as we cannot use cn=monitor or any > additional suffi

Best way to merge two local DITs vs empty search base suffix

2010-06-13 Thread Guy.Baconniere
Hello, We want to update our old OpenLDAP server from 2.1.x to 2.4.x but the current configuration do not use a regular suffix (o=foo,c=bar nor dc=foo,dc=bar) but use an empty suffix (""). We want to move away from empty suffix as we cannot use cn=monitor or any additional suffixes as they can no