--On Friday, April 9, 2021 12:05 AM + thomaswilliampritch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am migrating from single provider to N-Way provider in OpenLDAP 2.4.56
This configuration was setup years ago and reading the docs has me
questioning this piece of configuration. I notice we have no present
I am migrating from single provider to N-Way provider in OpenLDAP 2.4.56
This configuration was setup years ago and reading the docs has me questioning
this piece of configuration. I notice we have no present configured on our
syncprov overlay for our primary DB setup for delta sync. I noticed i
Thank you for clarification, now I am more clear. One more question, what
is the best or recommended way of doing n-way rep, should we replicate both
config db and user db as well ? Right now I am not replicating config.
On Sep 1, 2017 7:34 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" wrote:
--On Friday, September
Quanah,
Thank you, so do we need to include olcServerID of all servers in every
server? for example if i have 3 servers MMR, then do i need to add
olcServerID 1 $URl1
olcServerID 2 $URl2
olcServerID 3 $URl2
In all servers or just keep self ID?
Ram
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Quanah Gibson
--On Friday, September 01, 2017 6:03 PM -0700 rammohan ganapavarapu
wrote:
Quanah,
Thank you, so do we need to include olcServerID of all servers in every
server? for example if i have 3 servers MMR, then do i need to add
olcServerID 1 $URl1
olcServerID 2 $URl2
olcServerID 3 $URl2
So
--On Thursday, August 31, 2017 6:46 PM -0700 rammohan ganapavarapu
wrote:
Which one is the right way to do?
It depends. If you are replicating cn=config, then the provider= is
required, and it must include all providers. If you are not replicating
cn=config, then the provider= is not
Hi,
I have a basic question in N-Way Multi master replication configuration,
For example i have 3 servers and i wanted to setup N-Way replication across
those servers, in the "olcSyncRepl" configuration do i have to include the
Nth server it self?
On each server:
olcSyncRepl: rid=00
Hi,
I have n-way replication setup in ldap version 2.4.43 and i have basic
technical question, do we have to specify nth server details in replication
config? lets say i have server1 server2 and server3 and i wanted to setup
n-way replication among these servers
Part of my config looks like
--On Thursday, June 23, 2011 3:08 PM -0400 "Darouichi, Aziz"
wrote:
I started getting the message after I set sizelimit to unlimited to
correct "LDAP_RES_SEARCH_RESULT (4) Size limit exceeded".
As I said before. It doesn't sound like an error to me. It sounds like
you have a client that
mailto:qua...@zimbra.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Darouichi, Aziz; openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: N-Way replication
--On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:19 PM -0400 "Darouichi, Aziz"
wrote:
>
> I setup N-Way replication openldap-2.4.23 in RHEL5. Config f
--On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:19 PM -0400 "Darouichi, Aziz"
wrote:
I setup N-Way replication openldap-2.4.23 in RHEL5. Config file is
identical on both servers. In one server I get this error message in the
log.
send_search_entry: conn 1000 ber write failed.
Why do you think
I setup N-Way replication openldap-2.4.23 in RHEL5. Config file is identical on
both servers. In one server I get this error message in the log.
send_search_entry: conn 1000 ber write failed.
I run slapdindex, and turned off schemasearch. Error message still being
generated.
Thanks,
Hi,
Le 21/04/2010 21:05, Siddhartha Jain a écrit :
Hi,
First, kudos to OpenLDAP team for the progress they have made with 2.4.
I am returning to use OpenLDAP after nearly a decade and it is
heartening to see all the new features even when going from 2.3 to 2.4
(As a side rant, it is painful to
Hi,
First, kudos to OpenLDAP team for the progress they have made with 2.4. I am
returning to use OpenLDAP after nearly a decade and it is heartening to see all
the new features even when going from 2.3 to 2.4 (As a side rant, it is painful
to see Redhat/CentOS still ship 2.3.x. RedHat might
14 matches
Mail list logo
