Ulrich Windl wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4512#section-2.5
>>>
>>> I couldn't quite read it from there: The closest match I found was: "oid =
>>> descr / numericoid", but I was talking about the "on wire" protocol of LDAP.
>>> Are there really named objects and attributes?
>>
>> You r
Ulrich Windl wrote:
Michael Ströder schrieb am 10.12.2014:
>>> I thought the LDAP _protocol_ uses OIDs everywhere, and names are just for
>>> human users...?
>>
>> Nope. One could regard this as design deficiency (in comparison to X.500).
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4512#section-2.5
Ulrich Windl wrote:
Michael Ströder schrieb am 09.12.2014 um 16:31 in
> Nachricht <548715bf.7050...@stroeder.com>:
>> Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> I thought a schema having a OID is the same everywhere; would a modified
>> schema need a new OID then?
>>
>> Best practice is to assign a new OID if
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:31 PM +0200 Igor Shmukler
wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Thank you for answering my question. I am still confused...
If schema files are never used directly, while LDIFs are used instead;
why is there no tool which produces LDIF files suitable for ldapadd(1)
or/and
Hello Everybody,
Thank you for answering my question. I am still confused...
If schema files are never used directly, while LDIFs are used instead;
why is there no tool which produces LDIF files suitable for ldapadd(1)
or/and ldapodify(1)? Is it recommended to run a schema to LDIF
conversion, the
Ulrich Windl wrote:
> I thought a schema having a OID is the same everywhere; would a modified
> schema need a new OID then?
Best practice is to assign a new OID if anything changes for a schema element.
99.% of LDAP client applications don't care about OIDs though.
=> assign a new NAME too
Ulrich Windl wrote:
I thought a schema having a OID is the same everywhere; would a modified schema
need a new OID then?
Yes.
Modifying RFC-published schema is prohibited anyway.
Igor Shmukler schrieb am 02.12.2014 um 21:55 in
Nachricht
:
Hello,
I want to have an ability add "custom at
I thought a schema having a OID is the same everywhere; would a modified schema
need a new OID then?
>>> Igor Shmukler schrieb am 02.12.2014 um 21:55 in
Nachricht
:
> Hello,
>
> I want to have an ability add "custom attribute[s]" to my LDAP records.
> For example, such an attribute could be sip
On 2/12/2014 11:12 μμ, Igor Shmukler wrote:
Do I create a new schema file for my new attribute as in
${new_attribute}.schema and another for the new object using this new
attribute?
See also: http://www.openldap.org/devel/admin/schema.html
We have done it in this way: Got a registered OID fro
Igor Shmukler wrote:
> Do I create a new schema file for my new attribute as in
> ${new_attribute}.schema and another for the new object using this new
> attribute?
When using static configuration one usually uses include to add schema
declarations to the configuration.
Personally I put attribute
Igor Shmukler wrote:
> I want to have an ability add "custom attribute[s]" to my LDAP records.
> For example, such an attribute could be sipTelephone, mobile and/or
> something else.
>
> I did a little digging. Please advise whether I am on the right track.
>
> My understanding, at present, is th
Hello Quanah,
Thank you for your reply.
Do I create a new schema file for my new attribute as in
${new_attribute}.schema and another for the new object using this new
attribute?
Sincerely,
Igor Shmukler
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 02,
--On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:55 PM +0200 Igor Shmukler
wrote:
Hello,
I want to have an ability add "custom attribute[s]" to my LDAP records.
For example, such an attribute could be sipTelephone, mobile and/or
something else.
I did a little digging. Please advise whether I am on the rig
Hello,
I want to have an ability add "custom attribute[s]" to my LDAP records.
For example, such an attribute could be sipTelephone, mobile and/or
something else.
I did a little digging. Please advise whether I am on the right track.
My understanding, at present, is that I would have to modify
c
14 matches
Mail list logo