--On Friday, April 28, 2023 10:57 AM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Le 27/04/2023 à 19:53, Stefan Kania a écrit :
Your log is telling that you have three server
000, 001 and 003
csn=20190213173033.952331Z#00#000#00;20230427155638.609257Z#
00#001#00;20190916120217.913828Z#000
Le 27/04/2023 à 19:53, Stefan Kania a écrit :
Your log is telling that you have three server
000, 001 and 003
csn=20190213173033.952331Z#00#000#00;20230427155638.609257Z#00#001#00;20190916120217.913828Z#00#003#00
And as you can see the csn from 000 and 003 is from 2019 an
Your log is telling that you have three server
000, 001 and 003
csn=20190213173033.952331Z#00#000#00;20230427155638.609257Z#00#001#00;20190916120217.913828Z#00#003#00
And as you can see the csn from 000 and 003 is from 2019 and from 001
it's 2023 loos a little bit stange
Le 27/04/2023 à 19:28, Stefan Kania a écrit :
Why do you have two csn from 2019 and one from 2023?
Hum... I not sure to understand your question :( My two hosts was on the
same slapd version (2.5.13+dfsg-2~bpo11+1) from Debian Bullseye
Backports repository.
--
Benjamin Renard
Le 27/04/2023 à 19:17, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:12 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Apr 27 18:45:35 gavotte slapd[1086351]: conn=1224 op=1
syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search
Apr 27 18:45:35 gavotte slapd[1086662]: Stopping OpenLDAP: slapd.
Why do you have two csn from 2019 and one from 2023?
Am 27.04.23 um 19:12 schrieb Benjamin Renard:
Hello,
Le 25/04/2023 à 18:48, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 7:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
OK, thanks for your advice. I will try to update it on the prepr
--On Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:12 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Apr 27 18:45:35 gavotte slapd[1086351]: conn=1224 op=1
syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search
Apr 27 18:45:35 gavotte slapd[1086662]: Stopping OpenLDAP: slapd.
This shows two completely different PIDs for slapd?
Hello,
Le 25/04/2023 à 18:48, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 7:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
OK, thanks for your advice. I will try to update it on the preprod to be
sure I will be able to manage any upgrade issue.
You may find this helpful as well:
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 7:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Le 25/04/2023 à 18:15, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 6:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
The Debian security team always maintain the 2.4 version, even if there
have not been many securi
Le 25/04/2023 à 18:15, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 6:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
The Debian security team always maintain the 2.4 version, even if there
have not been many security updates since the switch to 2.4 :
https://metadata.ftp-master.debia
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 6:40 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
The Debian security team always maintain the 2.4 version, even if there
have not been many security updates since the switch to 2.4 :
https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/openldap/openld
ap_2.4.57+dfsg-
Le 25/04/2023 à 17:04, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 4:00 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Hello,
You'r right, 2.5 is available in backports, but I still preferred to used
stable version for fast delivery of security update. The next release of
Debian is coming
--On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 4:00 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Hello,
You'r right, 2.5 is available in backports, but I still preferred to used
stable version for fast delivery of security update. The next release of
Debian is coming soon, I will update my installations at this time.
Hello,
You'r right, 2.5 is available in backports, but I still preferred to
used stable version for fast delivery of security update. The next
release of Debian is coming soon, I will update my installations at this
time.
I reconfigure chaining on frontend instead on the database, but I stil
--On Saturday, April 22, 2023 6:07 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
you failed to provide any OpenLDAP version information.
You'r right, I'm using slapd 2.4.57+dfsg-3+deb11u1 (on Debian stable).
Hi,
As a side note, OpenLDAP 2.4 series is historic and no longer supported. I
believe
Le 21/04/2023 à 18:00, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
--On Friday, April 21, 2023 2:36 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with the olcPPolicyForwardUpdates option that seem not
Do you have any idea of what I doing wrong ?
Hello,
you failed to provide any OpenLDAP v
--On Friday, April 21, 2023 2:36 PM +0200 Benjamin Renard
wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with the olcPPolicyForwardUpdates option that seem not
Do you have any idea of what I doing wrong ?
Hello,
you failed to provide any OpenLDAP version information.
--Quanah
Hello,
I have problem with the olcPPolicyForwardUpdates option that seem not
working : On master and slave, I configured Ppolicy with pwdLockout.
When I try to connect on master with a bad password, the pwdFailureTime
attribute of the entry is successfully updated, but not if I do the same
on
18 matches
Mail list logo