Dmitriy Marmyshev has proposed merging lp:~marmyshev/openlp/autoplay into
lp:openlp.
Requested reviews:
Tim Bentley (trb143)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~marmyshev/openlp/autoplay/+merge/140289
Andded new future:
store autoplay option in service, start live the item with
mohij has proposed merging lp:~patrick-zakweb/openlp/bug-936281-newformat into
lp:openlp.
Requested reviews:
Andreas Preikschat (googol)
Jonathan Corwin (j-corwin)
Tim Bentley (trb143)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~patrick-zakweb/openlp/bug-936281-newformat/+merge/1402
Can you give some example for a setting, you can not realize (and which mases
sense of cause)?
According to the realization of the editor: I may add some "new" push button,
which focuses on the corresponding cell, and some "delete" button, which
removes the current row. That are the only points
Review: Needs Fixing
Validation is not correct as I was able to create HTML with no end HTML.
The editor does not give any clues as to what you need to do so is not
intuitive.
I think the UI is a backwards step so would look to other core developers for
their opinion on the UI changes.
Sorry
Question #216972 on OpenLP changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/openlp/+question/216972
Status: Answered => Solved
dexter4000 confirmed that the question is solved:
Thanks Jonathan Corwin, that solved my question.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Open
Meinert Jordan has proposed merging lp:~m2j/openlp/formattingtags into
lp:openlp.
Requested reviews:
Tim Bentley (trb143)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/formattingtags/+merge/140195
I forgot about this branch, and didn't realized, that it was never merged. Now
> As a general point we should not mix reformatting and code changes but that
> needs to be ratified!.
It is rather a complete rewrite. I can submitt this in the old style, but I
don't see the point.
> 241-242 and 243-244 should be one line.
This is done for purpose, as I think it is nicer to ma
Review: Needs Fixing
Need to look at the UI !
As a general point we should not mix reformatting and code changes but that
needs to be ratified!.
241-242 and 243-244 should be one line.
401-402 some line or 402 should be extra tab
554 should the regex be compiled into the CLASS once?
As a side
Meinert Jordan has proposed merging lp:~m2j/openlp/formattingtags into
lp:openlp.
Requested reviews:
OpenLP Core (openlp-core)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/formattingtags/+merge/140176
I forgot about this branch, and didn't realized, that it was never merged.
Meinert Jordan has proposed merging lp:~m2j/openlp/formattingtags into
lp:openlp.
Commit message:
formatting tag editor reworked
Requested reviews:
OpenLP Core (openlp-core)
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/formattingtags/+merge/140132
I forgot about this branch,
** Description changed:
Win7 Build 2127
If I have verse 1 in two parts, eg: Verse 1, 4 lines of lyrics, Verse 1, 4
more lines of lyric, stageview does not separate V1 into two parts on the
stageview display.
- Stageview V1 shows both Verse 1's run together but when I change slides to
the
** Summary changed:
- stageview display not working correctly
+ Need a blank line between verse splits in stageview
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenLP
Core, which is subscribed to OpenLP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091151
Title:
Need a blank line be
Public bug reported:
Win7 Build 2127
If I have verse 1 in two parts, eg: Verse 1, 4 lines of lyrics, Verse 1, 4 more
lines of lyric, stageview does not separate V1 into two parts on the stageview
display.
Stageview V1 shows both Verse 1's run together but when I change slides to the
second par
13 matches
Mail list logo
