Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2013-01-20 Thread Andreas Preikschat
Meinert: any change you pick up with this? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openlp-core Post to :

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-10-13 Thread Meinert Jordan
I suggested the use of Qt comparision as well, but as it was reported to have a poor performance, I delayed this until I had time to test the performance under Windows. For long time I did not take the time, to setup Windows and make a test. So please test the performance on Windows for big

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-10-12 Thread matysek
I think this merge can be closed since there is a new pending request to fix related bug. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-04-03 Thread Jonathan Corwin
Where was this left out of interest? Who is waiting on who? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openlp-core Post to :

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-28 Thread Raoul Snyman
Review: Needs Information Meinert, I'd just like us to do a little more playing around with this before we merge it. In particular I'm thinking of testing out the Search as you type speed, and documenting on the wiki how to include ICU in the Windows build. --

[Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-28 Thread Raoul Snyman
The proposal to merge lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp has been updated. Status: Approved = Work in progress For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-25 Thread Andreas Preikschat
Review: Needs Information A question, did you compare the performance? I am not sure, but isn't the function you specify called dozens times? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp.

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-25 Thread Meinert Jordan
I haven't checked it yet, as I have no Windows machine with Python arround ATM. The only position where we are sorting big lists is in the songs media manager (after editing/importing/deleting a song). Therefore we should have some realtime performance for up to 2000 strings. --

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-25 Thread Andreas Preikschat
The only position where we are sorting big lists is in the songs media manager (after editing/importing/deleting a song). Do not forget the Search as you type feature! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp.

[Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-19 Thread Tim Bentley
The proposal to merge lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-19 Thread Tim Bentley
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openlp-core Post to : openlp-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-10 Thread Meinert Jordan
While looking for other i18n things (and figuring out, that Qt just introduced nice methods like QLocale::createSeparatedList()), I stumbled over the fact, that the performance of Qts implementation of collation might be fine as well. Sorting 1500 strings with Python takes about 20ms so that

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-02-04 Thread Andreas Preikschat
Maybe somebody with windows should test this? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openlp-core Post to :

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-01-22 Thread Raoul Snyman
Review: Approve This looks OK to me. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 Your team OpenLP Core is subscribed to branch lp:openlp. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openlp-core Post to :

Re: [Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-01-19 Thread Meinert Jordan
Some more informations: ICU binaries for Windows have a size of arround 9MB as they contain a lot of data. I haven't figured out any other way to collide international strings on Windows with comparable performance. Some information about colliding and Qt can be found on this blog post:

[Openlp-core] [Merge] lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp

2012-01-18 Thread Meinert Jordan
Meinert Jordan has proposed merging lp:~m2j/openlp/bug-687638 into lp:openlp. Requested reviews: OpenLP Core (openlp-core) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~m2j/openlp/bug-687638/+merge/89098 I've splitted a previous merge request. This one contains only ICU integration: Bug