7:06, "seba.wag...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Peder,
>
> why should any *novice* has to play around with that at all?!?!
>
> Its your job as moderator to either decide *full-fit* to have the hole
> document visible OR to adjust the zoom manually to 100%. No other
> participant ex
The Demo site displays it somewhat better (http://www2.park.se/~peder/
Demo-wrong.jpg) but I still need to take some action (i.e. set the
zoom slider [which is now even harder for a novice to see and
understand] to 100%) if I want to be able read the document.
On 9 Nov, 16:28, "seb
To clarify one final time, if I load a document into the whiteboard in
OM-1.5 I get this result: http://www2.park.se/~peder/15-wrong.jpg
What I want to be displayed as default is this :
http://www2.park.se/~peder/15-right.jpg
If I interpret what my users says correctly, the latter was the
zoomed out page where I
either have to find some zoom button or buy a really strong magnifying
glass :)
On 9 Nov, 12:14, "seba.wag...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hallo Peder,
>
> what you mean is to see the *entire document* not *entired unzoomed*.
> Yes and that is what the n
0:26, "seba.wag...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hallo Peder,
>
> check the Demo Version onwww.openmeetings.de
>
> There is a new implementation of the full-fit and zooming in there.
> If you enable full fit, it will be displayed 100% VISIBLE (that means on a
> screen with 1024x
ttons.
- Peder
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenMeetings User" group.
To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-u...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
F
Is there an expected date for the next release of OM?
I was planning to upgrade to 1.3 but got the impression from another
post that a new release might not be that far away.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenMeetings User" group.
To post to this g
On 11 Juni, 13:33, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> I like your suggestion.
>
> $ find . -older -exec rm {} \;
>
I actually ran
find . -type f -mtime +15 -exec rm -f {} \;
to remove files 15 days or older, and I guess I could run that through
cron. But my question is if the developers have thought abo
On 28 Maj, 12:54, Peder wrote:
> The uploads directory of my OM installation is currently over 700MB,
> and some files are even from last year.
> Is there a "proper" way of removing old files or should/could I just
> search for files older than, say, 15 days and remove the
The uploads directory of my OM installation is currently over 700MB,
and some files are even from last year.
Is there a "proper" way of removing old files or should/could I just
search for files older than, say, 15 days and remove them manually?
--
You received this message because you are subscr
On 27 Nov, 19:02, hosdes wrote:
> Installing OpenMeetings is very straightforward but we want to upgrade
> our openmeetings and not lose our data in the database. Especially
> users, conferences and profiles data.
>
> How do we upgrade OpenMeetings? When we upgrade to the latest Nightly
> Build
It'd be very handy if one could enter multiple email addresses when
sending an invitation from a room.
Say I'd like to invite 10 people, then I'd rather only send it once
instead of having to click through it, type the invitation message and
click the right buttons ten times. I could also have th
u see there are many way to influence
> it either positive ... but also negative: You can make the Video-Pods
> Default sizes much smaller and you will see that the bandwidth usage will be
> smaller.
>
> So the problem here is that I can only get you numbers depending on a
> certain
=48kBit
So, which one is correct and what numbers should I use to predict bandwidth
requirements for default sessions?
Regards,
Peder
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenMeetings User&q
14 matches
Mail list logo
