A do agree, too - at least partially.
Imho enlightenment and illume may have the name they want - because nobody
will ever get in touch with those names (at least no one who cares about
functional names).
But applications that are available in a menu to let the user select them
should have a name t
Andy Powell wrote:
> On Friday 13 June 2008 04:28, Jeremy Chang wrote:
>>I think, to make it clear for everybody, we call it Splinter instead
>> of Diversity when talking about ASU.
>>That's more make sense?
>>
> None of this naming makes sense. I've never understood why these stupid names
On Friday, 13. June 2008 11:28:14 Jeremy Chang wrote:
>I think, to make it clear for everybody, we call it Splinter instead
> of Diversity when talking about ASU.
>That's more make sense?
I understand your idea but I think that trac is not able to offer different
project lists for differe
On Friday 13 June 2008 04:28, Jeremy Chang wrote:
>I think, to make it clear for everybody, we call it Splinter instead
> of Diversity when talking about ASU.
>That's more make sense?
>
None of this naming makes sense. I've never understood why these stupid names
are being used. Could some
I think, to make it clear for everybody, we call it Splinter instead
of Diversity when talking about ASU.
That's more make sense?
Regards.
Jeremy
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:58:08PM +0800, William Lai wrote:
> Regina,
>
> ASU test reports should mirror the same components used in trac:
>
>
Regina,
ASU test reports should mirror the same components used in trac:
Assassin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distro- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diversity - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-Illume - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exposure - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Graphic Design - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Manager - [EMAIL PRO
6 matches
Mail list logo
