Hi,
Am 03.11.2010 um 21:40 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
>> P.S. Could the list moderator please approve my subscription? I don't
>> receive new messages, have to refresh mailarchive in browser.
>
> Ask Zany or Marcel directly.
I'm reading the list and already solved the problem with Max off-list :
Am Mittwoch 03 November 2010, 18:48:58 schrieb max ulidtko:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> >Indeed there is. MODE_SRV is also used as initial value for the mode
> >field. Unless you take that obex_t and register as server with it, the
> >MODE_SRV does nothing (there is no listening FD so nothing comes
Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>Actually mode has been separated from state since some time, I don't
>think this patch even apply upstream anymore. But I agree that
>switching to server mode is a bit odd, but maybe there is a reason for
>that.
Oh gods. Switched to 1.4 to test some app which used an
Zitat von "Luiz Augusto von Dentz" :
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, max ulidtko wrote:
>> As far as I can figure out, an obex_t instance which makes a request
>> (obex client) should never get into a state with MODE_SRV set. This
>> breaks proper dispatching of events and so on.
>>
>> And so I
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, max ulidtko wrote:
> As far as I can figure out, an obex_t instance which makes a request
> (obex client) should never get into a state with MODE_SRV set. This
> breaks proper dispatching of events and so on.
>
> And so I assume that those MODE_SRV assignments
As far as I can figure out, an obex_t instance which makes a request
(obex client) should never get into a state with MODE_SRV set. This
breaks proper dispatching of events and so on.
And so I assume that those MODE_SRV assignments in obex_client.c were
some kind of mistake. The patch fixes it.
--
As far as I can figure out, an obex_t instance which makes a request
(obex client) should never get into a state with MODE_SRV set. This
breaks proper dispatching of events and so on.
And so I assume that those MODE_SRV assignments in obex_client.c were
some kind of mistake. The patch fixes it.
--
