On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> And this particular linking issue might not have anything to
>>> do with openocd at all, probably rather a autotools issue
>>> with Mac OS X or my own setup.
>>
>> l
pong.
On 1 January 2012 21:04, Krzysztof Szmurlo wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Please, answer me if you receive this email.
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
> --
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a
Hello everyone.
Please, answer me if you receive this email.
Regards
Krzysztof
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure a
If you want to see specific patches committed sooner, then
the best thing you can do is to create a Gerrit account and
record testing details or suggest improvements that you think
are required before the patches can be approved.
With Gerrit+Jenkins the role of the maintainers is driven further
in
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Andreas Fritiofson
wrote:
> Well, the same can be said for jtag vs swd vs . I
> think it's a fundamental flaw in the openocd architecture that it's so
> utterly jtag-centric,
Yup, but jtag services should stay jtag services. Transport specific
commands should creat
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think that there has to be some other way to use stlink than in the
> patch series in gerrit. The need to have "stlink newtap ..." instead of
> "jtag newtap ..." or "swd newtap ..." require completely different set
> of config file
Hi!
I think that there has to be some other way to use stlink than in the
patch series in gerrit. The need to have "stlink newtap ..." instead of
"jtag newtap ..." or "swd newtap ..." require completely different set
of config files for stlink... Or maybe this situation is somehow handled
now?
On Dec 31, 2011 4:35 PM, "Freddie Chopin" wrote:
>
> The first tester reports that what he tested works fine with OpenOCD. Is
> it OK for me to write a positive review in gerrit if there are more
> positive reports? Or maybe OpenOCD maintainers will handle this patch
> series on their own when the
