I just noticed that the STM32F1x series (and probably many others)
document the use of the ARM Private Peripheral Bus to program a MCU
device id code, located at 0xE0042000. From what I can tell, neither
the Ember nor the STM32w mention this in their data sheets. I don't
know if this means they j
Also if i remember correctly the flash controller is not exactly the
same as the stm32f1x, may be worth checking the em357 driver.
The em35x family are the same device as the stm32w.
I'm trying to get started on the stm32w version and I was hoping to
start from em357.c as a template
Dave Higton wrote:
> What is the state of support for the LPC1114
It's a Cortex-M0..
> via the Olimex ARM-USB-TINY-H?
And M0 only speak SWD, which may or may not be doable with the
TINY-H, but which in any case is not yet supported by OpenOCD.
> I'm overwhelmed by the volume of the documentati
Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
> if I want to pass checkpatch, I have to fix the formatting of a
> number of unrelated lines, so that it won't get inconsistent.
The lines being touched having fixed formatting would be enough to
pass checkpatch.
> Apart from being a PITA (I have better things to do),
Hi!
I've been getting a little annoyed lately by the nitpicking checkpatch
check in Jenkins. For example, my latest patch failed due to some
(non-documented?) check for tabs-after-spaces (
http://openocd.zylin.com/jenkins/job/openocd-gerrit/603/ ). The
problem is that the changed lines follow the
What is the state of support for the LPC1114 via the Olimex ARM-USB
-TINY-H? I've done a lot of searching, but I haven't found a clear
answer.
I have the IAR EWARM Kickstart tools v6.3, the TINY-H, and an Olimex
LPC-H1114 header board. I've downloaded the Linux and Windows versions
of OpenOCD; c
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Andreas Fritiofson (andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set
to Gerrit, which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/399
-- gerrit
commit f22a31832f2d0c45ca9c550c09eac40b3f8bf312
Author: Andreas Fritiofson
Date: Tue Jan 24 23:01:34
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
> HI all,
>
> I try my best to get the asm file work with the M0. I have modified the
> stm32f2x.S becaus eit look simpler than the on from the stm32f1x.S
>
But they are not equivalent and needs to be matched with their
corresponding C cod
Freddie Chopin wrote:
> W dniu 2012-01-24 16:01, Jonathan Dumaresq pisze:
>> HI all,
>>
>> I try my best to get the asm file work with the M0. I have modified
>> the stm32f2x.S becaus eit look simpler than the on from the
>> stm32f1x.S
>>
>> Here how it's look.
>>
>> // Build : arm-eabi-gcc -c
W dniu 2012-01-24 16:01, Jonathan Dumaresq pisze:
> HI all,
>
> I try my best to get the asm file work with the M0. I have modified the
> stm32f2x.S becaus eit look simpler than the on from the stm32f1x.S
>
> Here how it's look.
>
> // Build : arm-eabi-gcc -c stm32f2xxx.S
> .text
> .syn
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Spencer Oliver (s...@spen-soft.co.uk) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/398
-- gerrit
commit fce9c512d53b2c150f69f728d360658a51e8ed33
Author: Spencer Oliver
Date: Tue Jan 24 15:07:59 2012 +
HI all,
I try my best to get the asm file work with the M0. I have modified the
stm32f2x.S becaus eit look simpler than the on from the stm32f1x.S
Here how it's look.
// Build : arm-eabi-gcc -c stm32f2xxx.S
.text
.syntax unified
.cpu cortex-m0
.thumb
.thu
12 matches
Mail list logo
