Hi,
Firstly: openocd 0.5.0, win7 64bit, Olimex ARM-USB-OCD-H
I'm attempting to program a new stm32F103RG on a dev board of mine, and
running into trouble. I've been using an STM32F105RB for some time with no
issues. My program commands look like:
openocd -f stm32/olimex.cfg \
-c init \
-
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> How about this approach to the problem of scripting?
>>
>> - make OpenOCD a library
>> - make that library usable from Python & Lua.
>
> Lua works the other way around. It was, again, designed and
> implemented from gro
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> It's not about use, it's about development. "I don't know Tcl" comes
> up again and again. Me, I *did* know Tcl rather well, but haven't
> used it for more than 15 years and I am utterly disinterested in
> starting to use it again. Not so with
HelloI got an Segmentation Fault in OpenOCD 0.5.0 when running "enable_turbo" with str9xpec.Maybe its better to check 'tap0' for NULL before doing dereference of pointer, to get a more instructive error message back to user.Now I just got SegFault without knowing what was wrong.diff --git a/src/fla
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:10:36 +0100
> Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
>
>> I would be more convinced with Python. I see no reason why would
>> anybody choose Lua ove Python : it is more mature, has bigger
>> community, bunch of documentation... It c
On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:06 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I actually thought of a killer feature of switching to scripting
> programming language:
>
> How about if we could replace 80% of the C code with a scripting
> language without sacrificing performance and make 80% of the OpenOCD
> code unit-tes
On Feb 27, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> John wrote:
wish i could help, but i am no tcl expert either.
>>>
>>> Does anyone feel very strongly against replacing jimtcl with say lua?
>>
>> Only that it means rewriting and then re-debugging every script
>
> Yes, but on the other hand
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Attila Kinali (att...@kinali.ch) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit, which
you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/495
-- gerrit
commit 8711efaf490a4d0eb648605c1787d2e5e0740260
Author: Attila Kinali
Date: Tue Feb 28 12:39:41 2012 +0100
SAM3:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:10:36 +0100
Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> I would be more convinced with Python. I see no reason why would
> anybody choose Lua ove Python : it is more mature, has bigger
> community, bunch of documentation... It can be made small, and even
> embedded on the chip (http://code.g
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:46:56 +
Spencer Oliver wrote:
> In my original statement i was referring to the fact i am not familiar
> with integrating TCL-C. I can work my around tcl enough for OpenOCD
> usage.
>
> The other argument is how many people understand lua - probably the same as
> tcl.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
> In my original statement i was referring to the fact i am not familiar
> with integrating TCL-C. I can work my around tcl enough for OpenOCD
> usage.
>
> The other argument is how many people understand lua - probably the same as
> tcl.
>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:16:39 +0100
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Gerrit interprets this as three commits where one is dependent on the
> previous.
>
> This is harmless.
Ok, then i leave it like this.
Thanks
Attila Kinali
--
The trouble with you, Shev, is you don't say anyt
On 28 February 2012 06:46, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> I don't believe that there is much, if any, programming at all that
>> 95% of use cases involves and therefore there would not be much
>> advantage to a better language(I'm not saying Lua is).
>
> It's not about use, it's about development. "I don't
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Moin,
>
> I just send in two additional patches for the SAM3 code.
> Gerrit now seems to think that my 3 pending patches are dependend
> on each other. While they should be all applied for a working system,
> the actually do not depend on ea
Moin,
I just send in two additional patches for the SAM3 code.
Gerrit now seems to think that my 3 pending patches are dependend
on each other. While they should be all applied for a working system,
the actually do not depend on each other.
Now the question for me is, what did i do wrong that ger
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Attila Kinali (att...@kinali.ch) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit, which
you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/494
-- gerrit
commit c6d01a50097860ea8c056d9bd1da719883b2c26e
Author: Attila Kinali
Date: Tue Feb 28 09:50:09 2012 +0100
SAM3:
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Attila Kinali (att...@kinali.ch) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit, which
you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/493
-- gerrit
commit 36b285dfb5af88bd8ea2fe8d1915450781f0a9c9
Author: Attila Kinali
Date: Tue Feb 28 09:44:25 2012 +0100
SAM3S
I actually thought of a killer feature of switching to scripting
programming language:
How about if we could replace 80% of the C code with a scripting
language without sacrificing performance and make 80% of the OpenOCD
code unit-testable?
The idea is to get exception handling and resources tra
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> Anyway, I did not ask for buy-in. I asked if someone was strongly
>> against replacing Tcl. Not many, if any, were. I think this is good! :)
>
> I am strongly against replacing Jim Tcl. I don't think a very
> convincing case has been made th
19 matches
Mail list logo
