[OpenOCD-devel] PowerPC / OSBDM target questions

2015-05-04 Thread James Murray
New OpenOCD developer here... I've been doing some work to try to add support for PowerPC. I have an eval board that uses OSBDM and has a Freescale MPC5634. It is talking and I can get some things working, but there are many things not yet handled and some weirdnesses. Experienced devs will hopef

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] RoadMap Part 2

2015-05-04 Thread Michael Schwingen
On 04.05.2015 16:19, De Cesaris, Ivan wrote: > Hi All, > jumping on the topic of "the future of OpenOCD", one thing I'd like the core > group to consider is the license. > > Maybe this is not obvious to everyone but the code, being GPL, precludes some > usages. > I'm not a lawyer but I can't rele

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] RoadMap Part 2

2015-05-04 Thread Ellis, Duane
ivan>> jumping on the topic of "the future of OpenOCD", one thing I'd like the core group to consider is the license. This actually "on topic" if you ask me. There is also the subject of a "contributors agreement" Our legal department asked me if one existed - along with hundred other questions

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] RoadMap Part 2

2015-05-04 Thread Paul Fertser
Hey Ivan, Nice to see you back :) On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:19:23PM +, De Cesaris, Ivan wrote: > Maybe this is not obvious to everyone but the code, being GPL, > precludes some usages. I'm not a lawyer but I can't release > internal developed code for new silicon to any external customer >

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] RoadMap Part 2

2015-05-04 Thread Ed Beroset
"De Cesaris, Ivan" wrote: > >Hi All, >jumping on the topic of "the future of OpenOCD", one thing I'd like the core >group to consider is the license. > >Maybe this is not obvious to everyone but the code, being GPL, precludes some >usages. >I'm not a lawyer but I can't release internal developed

Re: [OpenOCD-devel] RoadMap Part 2

2015-05-04 Thread De Cesaris, Ivan
Hi All, jumping on the topic of "the future of OpenOCD", one thing I'd like the core group to consider is the license. Maybe this is not obvious to everyone but the code, being GPL, precludes some usages. I'm not a lawyer but I can't release internal developed code for new silicon to any extern