On January 10, 2019 12:49:20 AM PST, Andreas Fritiofson
wrote:
>Would be nice but I do think that should be handled by GDB and not by
>OpenOCD.
OK, yes, totally agreed there. It makes more sense to treat OOCD as the thing
that provides access to the target and GDB as the thing that interprets w
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:29 AM Christopher Head wrote:
> On January 9, 2019 2:46:13 PM PST, Tommy Murphy
> wrote:
> >Surely this is something that the target OS needs to support rather
> >than OpenOCD?
>
> I think it makes perfect sense in the context of a microcontroller. There
> may not *be*
