On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> duane> [new target process reset stuff]
>
> duane> [keep_alive() issues]
>
> oyvind> but I think it makes sense to keep "keepalive" a dirty little
> openocdsecret for now.
>
> So - I need to implement it somewhere so TCL can
duane> [new target process reset stuff]
duane> [keep_alive() issues]
oyvind> but I think it makes sense to keep "keepalive" a dirty little
openocdsecret for now.
So - I need to implement it somewhere so TCL can do the same thing the C
code is doing right?
Likewise - {timer callbacks below}
Øyvind> uh? What is this?
Øyvind> What's "arp"?
duane> [earlier]
FYI - in the work, the prefix "arp_" stands for "advanced reset
process".
Perhaps the arp_ prefix is dumb, and should be renamed.
I wanted to make this *CLEAR* that somebody should *NOT* be using the "target0
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All -
>
> Specifically:
>Valentin Longchamp [iMX31?? issues]
>Oyvind Harboe [general stuff]
>Spen Oliver [str9 hackery]
>Kees Jongenburger [ie: beagle board & adding targets on the fly]
>
All -
Specifically:
Valentin Longchamp [iMX31?? issues]
Oyvind Harboe [general stuff]
Spen Oliver [str9 hackery]
Kees Jongenburger [ie: beagle board & adding targets on the fly]
Nishanth Menon [ie: beagle board & cortex-a8 & etc]
I am now at the hear of the
>> I added you to command.c as well. I hope you don't mind.
Go right ahead.
-Duane.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering the non-trivial level of changes I've made to 'target.c' -
> perhaps I should stick my name in the copyright section.
Done.
>
> The other changes are minor tweaks
Well I kinda disagree on that one. Minima
Considering the non-trivial level of changes I've made to 'target.c' -
perhaps I should stick my name in the copyright section.
The other changes are minor tweaks
-Duane.
Index: src/target/target.c
===
--- src/target/target.c (r
Hi Folks,
I am trying to get openocd functioning with TI's OMAP3[1] processor on
beagleboard[2] using flyswatter[3]. There are some TI specific TAP
handling required which we are working on, but beyond that, I think we'd
need to have some sort of ARM specific handling.
Pinging to see if there are
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>
>> I'm putting together some GCC/GDB binairies.
>>
>> Comments/suggestions welcome:
>>
>
> Offering insight (gdb) instead might be better.
It would perhaps be nice to have Insight additionally, but I'
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I'm putting together some GCC/GDB binairies.
>
> Comments/suggestions welcome:
>
Offering insight (gdb) instead might be better.
-Duane.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.be
I'm putting together some GCC/GDB binairies.
Comments/suggestions welcome:
http://www.zylin.com/gccbinary.html
So far I've populated linux arm-elf and mips-elf and the rest will
be uploaded as we build them. (Still in progress...)
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XSca
I've committed Duane Ellis's target object patch.
Nothing should break with this release, but I *do* expect some friction.
I'll trust the community to post messages about any compaitiblity problems
and which we(Duane and I) are pretty confident can be addressed without
too much trouble.
This sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
