It would be *great* to crack this problem once and for all.
It's been discussed in the past on the list.
> 4) That algorithm should/could use a *COMMON* set of commands
> That is *common* to *ALL* targets.
For MIPS as well as ARM targets?
So each target type has a compiler built in?
Tran
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.
Spencer Oliver> We have just changed the stm32 flash driver buffer to
16k (was 8k).
Spencer Oliver> Is this worth doing on other flash drivers ??
Actually, I think coming up with a "common architecture" to do ARM flash
would be better, or is more important.
By that I specifically mean:
1) Downl
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
> > Committed patches 1 through 5 inclusive.
> >
> > Please check that the patches went in correctly.
>
> Yep, thanks.
One minor addition: list the new flag in the "nand write" help line.
diff --git a/src/fl
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:42:13PM +0100, joern kaipf wrote:
> Index: src/target/interface/oocdlink.cfg
> ===
> --- src/target/interface/oocdlink.cfg (Revision 0)
> +++ src/target/interface/oocdlink.cfg (Revision 0)
It seems this patc
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:32:19AM -0700, Jim Norton wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm a complete newbie to JTAG and embedded linux development. I have a
> TinCanTools "Hammer" board that comes with support for an older
> version of OpenOCD.
>
> However, I needed to use the newest version o
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Committed patches 1 through 5 inclusive.
>
> Please check that the patches went in correctly.
Yep, thanks.
Nicolas
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berl
Hi,I added a board file for the Olimex STM32-H103 eval board.Patch is attached.Cheers Esden --My blog: http://www.esden.netMy projects: http://open-bldc.org, http://multicopter.orgProjects I am involved in: http://ng.uavp.ch
openocd-svn-1440-olimex_stm32_h103.patch
Description: Binary data
PGP
I attach a config file for LPC2103 - hope that I've done that right (;
4\/3!!
Index: src/target/target/lpc2103.cfg
===
--- src/target/target/lpc2103.cfg (revision 0)
+++ src/target/target/lpc2103.cfg (revision 0)
@@ -0,0
Committed patches 1 through 5 inclusive.
Please check that the patches went in correctly.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Ope
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.b
The ECC data is automatically computed and written to the OOB area
when the oob_softecc option is passed to the "nand write" command.
---
src/flash/nand.c | 61 +
src/flash/nand.h | 12 ++
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 5 deletion
---
src/target/board/sheevaplug.cfg |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/target/board/sheevaplug.cfg b/src/target/board/sheevaplug.cfg
index 8e5c265..64e2596 100644
--- a/src/target/board/sheevaplug.cfg
+++ b/src/target/board/sheevaplug.cfg
@@ -99,8 +99,8
---
src/flash/Makefile.am | 18 ---
src/flash/nand.h |1 +
src/flash/nand_ecc.c | 126 +
3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/flash/nand_ecc.c
diff --git a/src/flash/Makefile.am b/src/flash/Make
This at least should make the "nand info" command a little more useful.
---
src/flash/nand.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/flash/nand.c b/src/flash/nand.c
index 2b3b517..7946e34 100644
--- a/src/flash/nand.c
+++ b/src/flash/nand.c
@@ -689,6 +68
Allocating a 6-byte memory location with malloc() is rather silly
when this can be allocated on the stack.
---
src/flash/nand.c |4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/flash/nand.c b/src/flash/nand.c
index 51755aa..2b3b517 100644
--- a/src/flash/nand.c
+++ b
Add missing STM32 "0x06412041, Revision A" BSTAPID to list of available ones.
This is checked against revision 8, 11-Feb-2009, of the RM0008 manual
from http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/rm/13902.pdf.
Also, I noticed that stm32.cfg will _not_ work for some targets per se,
as it basi
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
PayBack incident management system
Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition
http://www.payback.no/index_en.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.
Add full company name (if any), interface/dongle name, and URL to
all interface config files.
Please check the infos, I may not have gotten all of them right.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.or
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:36 AM, SimonQian wrote:
Hi,
I noticed there is a thread about supporting other
programming interfaces except JTAG.
How is it going?
There was some talk, but no action. It would require quite a bit of
infrastructure work to remove the assumption that every pld and targ
The follow patch improves algorithm performance slightly by only marking
registers that has really changed as dirty.
Tested with flash writing for STM32.
With the latest changes I can now get the following performance:
STM32-P103 board, FT2232 JTAG adapter
16 kB, jtag_khz 500
download to t
Hi,
We have just changed the stm32 flash driver buffer to 16k (was 8k).
Is this worth doing on other flash drivers ??
Cheers
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd
Spencer Oliver wrote:
>
>
>> Does anyone have any objections to committing this patch?
>>
>> It's relatively straightforward to revert and reportely
>> improves performance significantly and hurts noone(so far).
>> When we commit it we have a record of it at least
>>
>>
>
> Fine wit
Hi SimonQian,
On 4/2/09, SimonQian wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed there is a thread about supporting other
> programming interfaces except JTAG.
> How is it going?
>
I don't know much about it.
> I'll release a program with these support.
> I tested it on AVR_ISP/JTAG, C51_ISP, C8051F_C2/JTAG,
> PSOC
Ah, my bad I'm referring to:
ARM 1176JZF-S
Regards.
Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> s/Thank/Take/
> :-D
>
> On 4/2/09, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 4/2/09, plarroy wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Is arm116jzf-s known to be supported by openocd?
>>>
>>>
>> I think you
s/Thank/Take/
:-D
On 4/2/09, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 4/2/09, plarroy wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Is arm116jzf-s known to be supported by openocd?
>>
>
> I think you are asking about arm1136jf-s.
>
> Yes, it is supported!
>
> Thank a look on i.MX31 and i.MX35.
>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>
> Bes
Hi
On 4/2/09, plarroy wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is arm116jzf-s known to be supported by openocd?
>
I think you are asking about arm1136jf-s.
Yes, it is supported!
Thank a look on i.MX31 and i.MX35.
>
> Regards.
>
Best Regards,
Alan
___
Openocd-development m
> Does anyone have any objections to committing this patch?
>
> It's relatively straightforward to revert and reportely
> improves performance significantly and hurts noone(so far).
> When we commit it we have a record of it at least
>
Fine with me, i would also #if 0 the first scan_inou
Hi,
I noticed there is a thread about supporting other
programming interfaces except JTAG.
How is it going?
I'll release a program with these support.
I tested it on AVR_ISP/JTAG, C51_ISP, C8051F_C2/JTAG,
PSOC_ISSP, MSP430_JTAG(non-standard JTAG), and even
STM32_ISP(Comm port).
If such support
Hi,
Attached patch fixs:
1. call buf_cmp_mask to compare buffer with mask.
2. remove long lines according to GNU coding standard.
NOTE: The patch is untested, I don't have XC9572XL to test on.
And I'll prepare a patch for vsllink code according to GNU coding standard.
2009-04-02
Best Regards,
duane> A while ago a number of us noticed that OpenOCD *ASSUMES* that
all TAP
duane> transitions require 7 TMS clocks, which is quite wrong, and
problematic.
oyvind> You can use the pathmove if you need something else. E.g. XScale
and xsvf do this.
The problem is not there, the problem is in p
My previous patch only fix the BUG that error message display the
wrong information.
Yes, data should be compared bit by bit, not byte by byte.
And buf_cmp_mask can be called to do the comparation.
I'll provide a patch for this.
PS:
> P.S. It isn't really easy to read source code if it has long l
Hi
Is arm116jzf-s known to be supported by openocd?
Regards.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
35 matches
Mail list logo
