Hi all,
reading more MIPS documentation I came to certain assumptions how JTAG
debugging works with these cores (EJTAG), so I'll try to answer myself
for the future reference, but also as a possible motivation for
someone to comment on these :
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrot
> What do you think about this idea?
A step in the right direction, definitely!
I'm glad to see this process moving forward. We'll have more
good ideas for sure.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www
Am 01/07/2011 05:43 PM, schrieb Freddie Chopin:
> On 2011-01-07 17:22, Freddie Chopin wrote:
>> I've come up with an improvement of the idea - I'll present the patch
>> tomorrow. This will make it easier to create custom versions of specific
>> targets (;
>
> Here is an example of lpc2103.cfg with
Am 01/07/2011 05:44 PM, schrieb Øyvind Harboe:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michael Schwingen
> wrote:
>> Am 01/07/2011 05:18 PM, schrieb Øyvind Harboe:
>>> The construct below has a comment to explain
>>> what the following statement means => duplication.
>>>
>>> How about using named parame
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michael Schwingen
wrote:
> Am 01/07/2011 05:18 PM, schrieb Øyvind Harboe:
>> The construct below has a comment to explain
>> what the following statement means => duplication.
>>
>> How about using named parameters instead?
>>
>> I think named parameters might even
On 2011-01-07 17:22, Freddie Chopin wrote:
I've come up with an improvement of the idea - I'll present the patch
tomorrow. This will make it easier to create custom versions of specific
targets (;
Here is an example of lpc2103.cfg with this change (draft [; ):
# NXP LPC2103 ARM7TDMI-S with 32
Am 01/07/2011 05:18 PM, schrieb Øyvind Harboe:
> The construct below has a comment to explain
> what the following statement means => duplication.
>
> How about using named parameters instead?
>
> I think named parameters might even have a concept
> of default values in Tcl, but offhand I don't kno
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 2011-01-07 17:11, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>
>> Hopefully we can make some progress towards
>> simplifying the scripts going forward...
>
> I've come up with an improvement of the idea - I'll present the patch
> tomorrow. This will make it ea
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 2011-01-07 17:18, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>
>> How about using named parameters instead?
>
> Is that possible? How would that be done? This could be very nice, as now
> the comment with explanation is necessary. The same is true for "flash b
On 2011-01-07 17:18, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
How about using named parameters instead?
Is that possible? How would that be done? This could be very nice, as
now the comment with explanation is necessary. The same is true for
"flash bank" command. There is one "con" of such idea - the call to
se
On 2011-01-07 17:11, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hopefully we can make some progress towards
simplifying the scripts going forward...
I've come up with an improvement of the idea - I'll present the patch
tomorrow. This will make it easier to create custom versions of specific
targets (;
Would you
The construct below has a comment to explain
what the following statement means => duplication.
How about using named parameters instead?
I think named parameters might even have a concept
of default values in Tcl, but offhand I don't know the syntax
or construct.
So something like:
setup_lpc21
Merged.
Thanks!
Hopefully we can make some progress towards
simplifying the scripts going forward...
Would you mind having a crack at the other LPC series
scripts?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http:/
HI all,
I have a simple question for anyone worked with MIPS (EJTAG) before -
does it support "halt" mode debugging, or ROM monitor mode is only
option ?
Coming from the ARM world, I am looking for "halt" mode debugging, as
I am very limited on chip surface to add additional ROM.
1)
I read in one
14 matches
Mail list logo
