Please review - I'm not sure about more "drastic" changes (removing some
function calls), however all of them seem correct. I've tested it and it
now compiles on my system, the executable works (no functional testing).
Cheers!
From dbec85dc76abee585d59e0a1f406a81945bc2189 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
Very cool!
Perhaps you could split this patch into several patches with the first
patch to go in are with the most obvious fixes?
E.g. I was less sure about etb.c, but it might be fine...
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International
On 2011-06-02 08:12, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Perhaps you could split this patch into several patches with the first
patch to go in are with the most obvious fixes?
E.g. I was less sure about etb.c, but it might be fine...
Any hints on the method to split such commited change into several
commits
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 2011-06-02 08:12, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>> Perhaps you could split this patch into several patches with the first
>> patch to go in are with the most obvious fixes?
>>
>> E.g. I was less sure about etb.c, but it might be fine...
>>
>
> A
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Freddie Chopin
>> Any hints on the method to split such commited change into several
>> commits? GIT is still not my strongest side (;
>
> wip = work-in-progress, new branch below
>
> git checkout -b wip
> git
