Zach Welch scrisse:
> Since I was the one that did that work and overlooked these files, I
> have reviewed and committed the fixes that you provided. Sorry for the
> game delay.
Thanks a lot, openocd is now properly built on all supported Debian arch:
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=openoc
On 09/30/2010 01:50 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Luca Bruno scrisse:
>
>> ep93xx and at91rm9200 are conditionally built only on arm and were not
>> updated to reflect changes in command registration handler.
>> This patch makes them properly compile again, fixing a build failure
>> experienced on Debia
Luca Bruno scrisse:
> ep93xx and at91rm9200 are conditionally built only on arm and were not
> updated to reflect changes in command registration handler.
> This patch makes them properly compile again, fixing a build failure
> experienced on Debian armel.
Before integrating this patch in our dow
Hector Oron scrisse:
> I have also been playing with this bug. Just one comment on the
> ep93xx.c
>
> > -static int ep93xx_register_commands(struct command_context
> > *cmd_ctx);
> >
> > - .register_commands = ep93xx_register_commands,
>
> Why not just use the right value in the struct,
>
Hello Luca,
I have also been playing with this bug. Just one comment on the ep93xx.c
> diff --git a/src/jtag/drivers/ep93xx.c b/src/jtag/drivers/ep93xx.c
> index 0959a56..09312c5 100644
> --- a/src/jtag/drivers/ep93xx.c
> +++ b/src/jtag/drivers/ep93xx.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ static void ep93xx_writ
ep93xx and at91rm9200 are conditionally built only on arm and were not
updated to reflect changes in command registration handler.
This patch makes them properly compile again, fixing a build failure
experienced on Debian armel.
Signed-off-by: Luca Bruno
---
src/jtag/drivers/at91rm9200.c | 30
