Just to clarify: this patch does nothing, it just moves files around.
It makes subsequent swd patches less noisy.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in |1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 +
src/jtag/Makefile.am |2 -
src/jtag/adapter.c|2 +-
src/jtag/core.c
Øyvind,
could you please remake the patch adding the flags -M -C to git
format-patch and post it again?
These flags will detect the file move/rename and highlight just the
modifications.
Patch review would be much easier.
Thank you
Antonio
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Øyvind Harboe
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
as we introduce swd and jtag as two transports, we want
to start up with a new transport folder to organize the
code a bit.
---
configure.in|1 +
src/Makefile.am |2 ++
src/jtag/Makefile.am|2 --
src/jtag/adapter.c
Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
Openocd-development mailing
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Oyvind! Thank you for support in this matter! Just please add
those patches to new branch v0.5 as they bring general code
reorganization and are not part of 0.4.x :-)
I'll update master branch.
The way git works we
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
I'll update master branch.
The way git works we don't cut development branches, we just
keep working on master branch.
We may cut a 0.5 branch from some previous time in master
history later on.
Ah, there is
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few commits.
Possibly reverting commits in master branch?
Yeah now I know how things
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
We never will merge 0.5.0 release branch into the master branch, ideally
it would receive zero, but realistically might receive a few
10 matches
Mail list logo