>> What do you think about the new structure?
>
> By structure, if you mean default value handling,
> I didn't like the complex if/then/... stuff, so
> count the subroutine a win, even if it adds a
> potentially confusing OpenOCD-only mechanism.
Note that it's backwards compatible. You can employ
--- On Sun, 12/19/10, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
> > A good simplification would be to remove every
> > non-BIG endianness setting.
> The big/little endian issue is orthogonal to how we
> organize the config files.
But not to $SUBJECT of this specific thread.
>
> What do you think about th
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 5:22 PM, David Brownell wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>
>
>> -if { [info exists ENDIAN] } {
>> - set _ENDIAN $ENDIAN
>> -} else {
>> - set _ENDIAN little
>
>
>
> A good simplification would be to remove every
> non-BIG endianness setting.
--- On Sun, 12/19/10, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> -if { [info exists ENDIAN] } {
> - set _ENDIAN $ENDIAN
> -} else {
> - set _ENDIAN little
A good simplification would be to remove every
non-BIG endianness setting. When not
specified, the OpenOCD default is "little".
Including "little"
Illustration of the new config script handling scheme.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe
---
tcl/board/at91cap7a-stk-sdram.cfg | 297 ++---
1 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcl/board/at91cap7a-stk-sdram.cfg
b/tcl/board/at91cap7a-stk-
