Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Laurent Gauch
Xiaofan Chen wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should be granted and the

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >>> But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the >>> libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. >> >> This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exce

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-21 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the >> libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx. > > This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should > be granted and the patch should be accep

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> Latest version, 1.0.4. Same behaviour on both MacOSX and Linux. >> >> Sure. I'll ask if they would like to fix this problem. >> I will let you know what useful response I get. >> > > Great. > > But are you sure to have the correct libusb ver

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 4:45 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: > Steve Bennett wrote: >> On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> >> On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> / />>/ >/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett > workware.net.au >>

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Laurent Gauch
Steve Bennett wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: / />>/ >/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>> wrote: />>/ />>/ On 20/06/2011, a

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 3:59 PM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> >> >>/ />>/ >/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett > >>workware.net.au >> >>> wrote: >> />>/ />>/ On 20/06/2011, at 8:54

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Laurent Gauch
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >>/ />>/ >/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>> wrote: />>/ />>/ On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: />>/ />>/ />>>/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Ben

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Steve Bennett
On 21/06/2011, at 1:07 AM, Laurent Gauch wrote: >> >> >/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett > >> wrote: >> />>/ On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> />>/ />>>/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Bennett

Re: [Openocd-development] [PATCH 2/3] ft2232: Failure to get latency should not be fatal / OBJECTION

2011-06-20 Thread Laurent Gauch
>/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Steve Bennett https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>> wrote: />>/ On 20/06/2011, at 8:54 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote: />>/ />>>/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Steve Bennett https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>>