Re: [Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] let reset_config tokens appear in any order

2009-05-27 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:55 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Make it so the magic "reset_config" keywords can be provided in any > > order. Example, "trst_and_srst" after "srst_open_drain", omitting > > the "separate" combination (which should be the

Re: [Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] let reset_config tokens appear in any order

2009-05-27 Thread Zach Welch
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:55 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Make it so the magic "reset_config" keywords can be provided in any > order. Example, "trst_and_srst" after "srst_open_drain", omitting > the "separate" combination (which should be the default in any case). These sorts of improvement se

Re: [Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] let reset_config tokens appear in any order

2009-05-26 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 25 May 2009, David Brownell wrote: > Make it so the magic "reset_config" keywords can be provided in any > order.  Example, "trst_and_srst" after "srst_open_drain", omitting > the "separate" combination (which should be the default in any case). > > Why?  (a) Makes it easier to d

[Openocd-development] [patch/rfc] let reset_config tokens appear in any order

2009-05-25 Thread David Brownell
Make it so the magic "reset_config" keywords can be provided in any order.  Example, "trst_and_srst" after "srst_open_drain", omitting the "separate" combination (which should be the default in any case). Why?  (a) Makes it easier to define things at the right level (adapter, board