On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> >
> > p.s. One thought about doc. Including the pre-generated PDF
> > with the source tarbal seems like it'd be useful...
>
> *sigh* This "one thought" caused me to generate an entirely new post to
> address this point in sufficient detail. I
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 16:34 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 09:22 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > > > does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
> > >
> > > No
On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 09:22 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > > does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
> >
> > No, but I'd like to send in one patch updating target/davinci.cfg
> > P
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 09:22 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
>
> No, but I'd like to send in one patch updating target/davinci.cfg
> PLL handling. I noticed one minor buglet affecting curren
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 09:54 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
>
> Oh, and I'd still like to see the at91sam3 config files
> become non-executable. :)
Thanks for noticing this. I believe that all of the files under tcl/
should now have
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 20:09 +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> >> does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
> >
> > Oh, and I'd still like to see the at91sam3 config files
> > become non-executable. :)
> >
>
> You make me think that next release will
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:54 PM, David Brownell wrote:
>> does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
>
> Oh, and I'd still like to see the at91sam3 config files
> become non-executable. :)
What was this again?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting service
David Brownell wrote:
>> does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
>
> Oh, and I'd still like to see the at91sam3 config files
> become non-executable. :)
>
You make me think that next release will be in very far future :)
I guess I have skipped the mentioning of this but c
> does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
Oh, and I'd still like to see the at91sam3 config files
become non-executable. :)
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman
Kevin Bortis pisze:
> Could you please explain me how you calculated the work-area-size
> value of 20k for the stm32? I have searched in the docu and on the
> internet, but the only thing I got about the work-area-size was, that
> the flash code for the stm32 uses about 48byte. What is the rest use
On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> does the community know of any reason to hold this countdown?
No, but I'd like to send in one patch updating target/davinci.cfg
PLL handling. I noticed one minor buglet affecting current code
and have some new bits (all Tcl code) I'd like to get in now
Thank you for correcting me.
Could you please explain me how you calculated the work-area-size
value of 20k for the stm32? I have searched in the docu and on the
internet, but the only thing I got about the work-area-size was, that
the flash code for the stm32 uses about 48byte. What is the rest u
Committed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
"Řyvind Harboe" napisał(a):
> Can you do one better and submit a correct patch?
The mechanism itself is fine, so I just fixed the descriptions and numbers. And
some other minor things by the way.
4\/3!!
work-area-fix.patch
Description: Binary data
Do you have a link to the definitive version? (I didn't follow
this discussion)
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://l
> -Original Message-
> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
> development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Zach Welch
> Sent: dinsdag 30 juni 2009 12:13
> To: openocd-development
> Subject: [Openocd-development] Final Fixes for
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:03 PM, wrote:
> Revert patch for r2419, as it is wrong. Work-area is the size of used RAM,
> not flash.
Can you do one better and submit a correct patch?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com
Revert patch for r2419, as it is wrong. Work-area is the size of used RAM, not
flash.
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
Hi all,
We have reached the scheduled release window. Are we ready to jump
through it, or do obstacles remain in our path? I would like to release
the 0.2.0 archives on the project files section of the berliOS site, so
packagers may begin to integrate these into their distributions.
As of this
19 matches
Mail list logo
