> Sounds ok then.
Committed.
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
Free eCos workshop in Oslo October 21!
http://www.zylin.com/workshop.html
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> But if you want to break all "target_script" - commands - go ahead - they
>> will all be broken when you do that.
>>
>
> The patch does not break target_script command, it uses reset-init
> instead of old-post_reset.
>
> So assuming that target_script is not broken, is
> But if you want to break all "target_script" - commands - go ahead - they
> will all be broken when you do that.
The patch does not break target_script command, it uses reset-init
instead of old-post_reset.
So assuming that target_script is not broken, is there a reason to
keep old-reset_post?
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Can anyone see a reason to keep old-reset_post?
>
> It makes more sense to stick to "reset-init", right?
>
> Of course the other "old-xxx" should also be retired
> likewise.
>
No no no, we had this discussion already, the "old-" need to stay
https://lists.berlios.de/pipe
Can anyone see a reason to keep old-reset_post?
It makes more sense to stick to "reset-init", right?
Of course the other "old-xxx" should also be retired
likewise.
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
Free eCos workshop in
