On Friday 26 March 2010, Daniel Bäder wrote:
>
> >
> > What version of Cygwin complains?
> >
> > I did a test build with this patch reverted, and it worked just fine...
>
> I think the cygwin version was 1.7.1 but I had this problem on serveral
> earlier versions (SVN).
> I have now installed
David Brownell schrieb:
On Thursday 25 March 2010, Daniel Bäder wrote:
When using uint32_t in LOG_xxx functions the PRIx32 or PRId32 macros are needed
in the format string instead of x and d to compile with cygwin.
The attached patch corrects this.
What version of Cygwin complains?
I did a
On Thursday 25 March 2010, Daniel Bäder wrote:
> When using uint32_t in LOG_xxx functions the PRIx32 or PRId32 macros are
> needed in the format string instead of x and d to compile with cygwin.
> The attached patch corrects this.
What version of Cygwin complains?
I did a test build with this p
Pushed.
Thanks!
--
Meet us in Paris at rts EMBEDDED SYSTEMS 2010 - March 30. and April 1.
http://www.zylin.com/events_rts.html
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash progra
When using uint32_t in LOG_xxx functions the PRIx32 or PRId32 macros are needed
in the format string instead of x and d to compile with cygwin.
The attached patch corrects this.
>From 6ce7282be99d073f4ef9d71feda770b67eb12080 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Bäder
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:2