One problem about jtag_add_end_state() is that it's effectively
setting a global variable.
This makes it hard to tell, reading some code, what is expected
to happen after a JTAG scan.
Some other calling code invoked jtag_add_end_state() with some
end state.
Other than running the debugger, I don
I have been giving this a lot of thought, and I would like to suggest a
compromise :)
I dont have the code with me right now so some of some function names
´might be a bit off but the idea should be clear.
> One problem about jtag_add_end_state() is that it's effectively
> setting a global variab
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> I have been giving this a lot of thought, and I would like to suggest a
> compromise :)
>
> I dont have the code with me right now so some of some function names
> ´might be a bit off but the idea should be clear.
>
>> One problem about jtag_
On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it
so it's no longer nonsense.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
ht
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote:
>> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
>
> I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it
> so it's no longer nonsense.
The point is to do away with "don't care", "default" an
On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
> >
> > I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it
> > so it's no longer nonsense.
>
> The point
Make that: "another" point.
> is to do away with "don't care", "default" and global var
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, David Brownell wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote:
>>
>>> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
>>>
>> I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it
>> so it's no longer nonsense.
>>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, David Brownell wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote:
>>>
Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
>>> I was wondering about that. Someone should
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:11 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Řyvind Harboe wrote:
>> >> Not always, TAP_INVALID is really TAP_DONTCARE
>> >
>> > I was wondering about that. Someone should rename it
>> > so it's no longer nonsense.
>>
>> The point
>
> Make that: "another" po
